Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13721 - 13730 of 58267 for speedy trial.
Search results 13721 - 13730 of 58267 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
96-CV-1749 William A. Pangman v. Richard William King
an “immediate possessory interest” in the shares of stock at issue. King also requests a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2544 - 2017-09-19
an “immediate possessory interest” in the shares of stock at issue. King also requests a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2544 - 2017-09-19
Duane P. Reusch v. Mark W. Roob
Roob’s appellate claims may be summarized as follows. The trial court erred as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14710 - 2005-03-31
Roob’s appellate claims may be summarized as follows. The trial court erred as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14710 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Duane P. Reusch v. Mark W. Roob
. The trial court erred as a matter of law in concluding: (1) that his relationship with the Reusches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14710 - 2017-09-21
. The trial court erred as a matter of law in concluding: (1) that his relationship with the Reusches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14710 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Peter G. Tkacz
potential bargain between the State and one of its primary witnesses; (3) the trial court improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12308 - 2017-09-21
potential bargain between the State and one of its primary witnesses; (3) the trial court improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12308 - 2017-09-21
Duane S. Jorgensen v. Water Works, Inc.
Tesch. The Jorgensens contend that the trial court erred in deciding the motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12626 - 2009-05-06
Tesch. The Jorgensens contend that the trial court erred in deciding the motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12626 - 2009-05-06
Tri City National Bank v. Salvatore J. Palmisano
under §§ 806.07(1)(c) and (h), Stats. The trial court denied the motion, concluding that it lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10606 - 2005-03-31
under §§ 806.07(1)(c) and (h), Stats. The trial court denied the motion, concluding that it lacked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10606 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jermaine L. O'Conner
of counsel;” and (2) whether the trial court erred in accepting his guilty plea. This court concludes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10906 - 2005-03-31
of counsel;” and (2) whether the trial court erred in accepting his guilty plea. This court concludes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10906 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
no contest to the charges. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29758 - 2007-07-18
no contest to the charges. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29758 - 2007-07-18
State v. James T. Rogers
. PER CURIAM. James Rogers appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13955 - 2005-03-31
. PER CURIAM. James Rogers appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13955 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Tri City National Bank v. Salvatore J. Palmisano
judgment under §§ 806.07(1)(c) and (h), STATS. The trial court denied the motion, concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10606 - 2017-09-20
judgment under §§ 806.07(1)(c) and (h), STATS. The trial court denied the motion, concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10606 - 2017-09-20