Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13741 - 13750 of 30128 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13741 - 13750 of 30128 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence J. Gegare
is a question of law subject to de novo review.” Id. “No fourth amendment issue arises in a consensual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13563 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law subject to de novo review.” Id. “No fourth amendment issue arises in a consensual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13563 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
statutes to a set of facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Arends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88073 - 2014-09-15
statutes to a set of facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Arends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88073 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law, which we decide de novo. Id. ¶15 An ineffective assistance of counsel claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204073 - 2017-11-30
is a question of law, which we decide de novo. Id. ¶15 An ineffective assistance of counsel claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204073 - 2017-11-30
State v. Eugene E. Volk
facts, our review is de novo. See State v. Eesley, 225 Wis. 2d 248, 254, 591 N.W.2d 846 (1999), cert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2511 - 2005-03-31
facts, our review is de novo. See State v. Eesley, 225 Wis. 2d 248, 254, 591 N.W.2d 846 (1999), cert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2511 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that our review is de novo. We disagree. Pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 54.68(4), the circuit court may remove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63166 - 2011-04-25
that our review is de novo. We disagree. Pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 54.68(4), the circuit court may remove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63166 - 2011-04-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to begin the process. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that this court reviews de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=621130 - 2023-02-15
to begin the process. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that this court reviews de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=621130 - 2023-02-15
[PDF]
State v. Jason S. Petri
assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14748 - 2017-09-21
assistance of counsel is a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. See id. at 634, 369 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14748 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
and an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36112 - 2014-09-15
and an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36112 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and now received $366 per week in unemployment compensation, a de minimis change of $22. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81500 - 2014-09-15
and now received $366 per week in unemployment compensation, a de minimis change of $22. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81500 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
The Baraboo National Bank v. State
., 1921. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law which we review de novo. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8561 - 2017-09-19
., 1921. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law which we review de novo. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8561 - 2017-09-19