Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13741 - 13750 of 68466 for did.
Search results 13741 - 13750 of 68466 for did.
WI App 36 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP3007-CR Complete Tit...
to the briefcase during the search. We conclude that the circuit court correctly found that Wantland did not limit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92854 - 2013-03-26
to the briefcase during the search. We conclude that the circuit court correctly found that Wantland did not limit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92854 - 2013-03-26
State v. Jeffrey A.T.
) the dispositional order is based upon a recommendation made in violation of § 938.33 because the court report did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4634 - 2005-03-31
) the dispositional order is based upon a recommendation made in violation of § 938.33 because the court report did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4634 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on August 8th; isn’t that correct? A. No. Q. No? A. Not that I can -- Q. When did you learn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135470 - 2017-09-21
on August 8th; isn’t that correct? A. No. Q. No? A. Not that I can -- Q. When did you learn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135470 - 2017-09-21
State v. Gregory L. Hoover
. [The prosecutor], I believe, was notified by phone. And so Deputy Applegate, I just wanted to know, did you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2135 - 2005-03-31
. [The prosecutor], I believe, was notified by phone. And so Deputy Applegate, I just wanted to know, did you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2135 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
a witness who did not testify at trial. We reject his arguments and affirm the order. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31319 - 2014-09-15
a witness who did not testify at trial. We reject his arguments and affirm the order. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31319 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, 225 Wis. 2d at 291. The defendant “must also show that the reason actually exists.” Id. Lopez did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34835 - 2008-12-08
, 225 Wis. 2d at 291. The defendant “must also show that the reason actually exists.” Id. Lopez did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34835 - 2008-12-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for the court’s consideration at sentencing. At the Machner 3 hearing, trial counsel testified that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135949 - 2017-09-21
for the court’s consideration at sentencing. At the Machner 3 hearing, trial counsel testified that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135949 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
received the dispatch, Olson did not know the name of the caller. ¶4 After receiving the call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82367 - 2014-09-15
received the dispatch, Olson did not know the name of the caller. ¶4 After receiving the call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82367 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the suppression hearing transcript reveals that this statement is in error. It is true that Officer Robinson did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46199 - 2014-09-15
of the suppression hearing transcript reveals that this statement is in error. It is true that Officer Robinson did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46199 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the evidence at trial did not establish that Kevin Flannigan, the witness who testified as to those records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191378 - 2017-09-21
the evidence at trial did not establish that Kevin Flannigan, the witness who testified as to those records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191378 - 2017-09-21