Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13741 - 13750 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 13741 - 13750 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues he is entitled to a new trial based on newly discovered evidence or, alternatively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235522 - 2019-02-20
argues he is entitled to a new trial based on newly discovered evidence or, alternatively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235522 - 2019-02-20
[PDF]
Alan D. Eisenberg v. Adrienne Seider
and Curley, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Alan D. Eisenberg appeals from the trial court judgment, following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5217 - 2017-09-19
and Curley, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Alan D. Eisenberg appeals from the trial court judgment, following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5217 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Lyle L. Smith v. Kenneth J. Bosveld
, § 706.02(1), STATS. The trial court disagreed and dismissed the Smiths’ complaint. We reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12388 - 2017-09-21
, § 706.02(1), STATS. The trial court disagreed and dismissed the Smiths’ complaint. We reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12388 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the remaining counts were dismissed but read in. The trial court ordered a presentence investigation report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149722 - 2017-09-21
, the remaining counts were dismissed but read in. The trial court ordered a presentence investigation report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149722 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David E. Williams
to a new trial in the interest of justice; and (3) his due-process rights were violated because the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4450 - 2017-09-19
to a new trial in the interest of justice; and (3) his due-process rights were violated because the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4450 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jonathan P. Cole
should be released from custody. The basis for his motion is his contention that the trial court never
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13217 - 2005-03-31
should be released from custody. The basis for his motion is his contention that the trial court never
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13217 - 2005-03-31
Jerome J. Blonien v. Charlotte Fleischman
Law, contrary to § 19.97, Stats.[1] Blonien claims that the trial court erred in granting the board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8466 - 2005-03-31
Law, contrary to § 19.97, Stats.[1] Blonien claims that the trial court erred in granting the board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8466 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bentura Martinez
to confrontation and his right to present a defense were violated when the trial court precluded his full
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9312 - 2005-03-31
to confrontation and his right to present a defense were violated when the trial court precluded his full
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9312 - 2005-03-31
State v. Margaret C.
from the trial court order, following a jury trial, terminating her parental rights to Joseph W.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14792 - 2005-03-31
from the trial court order, following a jury trial, terminating her parental rights to Joseph W.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14792 - 2005-03-31
Duane P. Reusch v. Mark W. Roob
Roob’s appellate claims may be summarized as follows. The trial court erred as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14710 - 2005-03-31
Roob’s appellate claims may be summarized as follows. The trial court erred as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14710 - 2005-03-31