Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13751 - 13760 of 58531 for speedy trial.
Search results 13751 - 13760 of 58531 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
and also hold that Weichman’s appeal is frivolous. We remand to the trial court for a determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28331 - 2014-09-15
and also hold that Weichman’s appeal is frivolous. We remand to the trial court for a determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28331 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Danny W. Filter
-2- the trial court's refusal to grant a separate trial on the drug charge violated § 971.12(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11234 - 2017-09-19
-2- the trial court's refusal to grant a separate trial on the drug charge violated § 971.12(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11234 - 2017-09-19
State v. Trevor D. Jones
that the trial court erred by determining that he knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2945 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred by determining that he knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2945 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the remaining counts were dismissed but read in. The trial court ordered a presentence investigation report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149722 - 2017-09-21
, the remaining counts were dismissed but read in. The trial court ordered a presentence investigation report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149722 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeffrey Lilly
for postconviction relief. He argues that he was denied a fair trial by reference to his request for counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9493 - 2015-02-25
for postconviction relief. He argues that he was denied a fair trial by reference to his request for counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9493 - 2015-02-25
State v. Jeffrey Lilly
for postconviction relief. He argues that he was denied a fair trial by reference to his request for counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9492 - 2015-02-25
for postconviction relief. He argues that he was denied a fair trial by reference to his request for counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9492 - 2015-02-25
Susan A. Wiseman v. Kevin R. Wiseman
CURIAM. Kevin and Susan Wiseman were divorced on December 18, 2002.[1] Among other things, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6493 - 2005-03-31
CURIAM. Kevin and Susan Wiseman were divorced on December 18, 2002.[1] Among other things, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6493 - 2005-03-31
Duane P. Reusch v. Mark W. Roob
Roob’s appellate claims may be summarized as follows. The trial court erred as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14710 - 2005-03-31
Roob’s appellate claims may be summarized as follows. The trial court erred as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14710 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Duane P. Reusch v. Mark W. Roob
. The trial court erred as a matter of law in concluding: (1) that his relationship with the Reusches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14710 - 2017-09-21
. The trial court erred as a matter of law in concluding: (1) that his relationship with the Reusches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14710 - 2017-09-21
Duane S. Jorgensen v. Water Works, Inc.
Tesch. The Jorgensens contend that the trial court erred in deciding the motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12626 - 2005-03-31
Tesch. The Jorgensens contend that the trial court erred in deciding the motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12626 - 2005-03-31