Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13751 - 13760 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Search results 13751 - 13760 of 58547 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Rudy A. Wendt
is decided by a single judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(f), STATS. No. 97-2686-CR 2 that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13020 - 2017-09-21
is decided by a single judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(f), STATS. No. 97-2686-CR 2 that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13020 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
charges. During the trial, as is appropriate,3 there was no documentary or other evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27380 - 2014-09-15
charges. During the trial, as is appropriate,3 there was no documentary or other evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27380 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Eugene A. Pagois
. On appeal, Pagois seeks to have his conviction vacated and remanded for a new trial. Pagois argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9135 - 2017-09-19
. On appeal, Pagois seeks to have his conviction vacated and remanded for a new trial. Pagois argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9135 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. David E. Williams
to a new trial in the interest of justice; and (3) his due-process rights were violated because the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4450 - 2017-09-19
to a new trial in the interest of justice; and (3) his due-process rights were violated because the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4450 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Lyle L. Smith v. Kenneth J. Bosveld
, § 706.02(1), STATS. The trial court disagreed and dismissed the Smiths’ complaint. We reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12388 - 2017-09-21
, § 706.02(1), STATS. The trial court disagreed and dismissed the Smiths’ complaint. We reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12388 - 2017-09-21
State v. David E. Williams
assistance of counsel; (2) he is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice; and (3) his due-process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4450 - 2005-03-31
assistance of counsel; (2) he is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice; and (3) his due-process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4450 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jerome J. Blonien v. Charlotte Fleischman
Law, contrary to § 19.97, STATS.1 Blonien claims that the trial court erred in granting the board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8466 - 2017-09-19
Law, contrary to § 19.97, STATS.1 Blonien claims that the trial court erred in granting the board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8466 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Sakajust K. Scott appeals from a trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252302 - 2020-01-08
for the limited purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Sakajust K. Scott appeals from a trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252302 - 2020-01-08
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
) and 340.01(46m). A jury convicted him of both charges. During the trial, as is appropriate,[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27380 - 2015-07-15
) and 340.01(46m). A jury convicted him of both charges. During the trial, as is appropriate,[3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27380 - 2015-07-15
State v. Eugene C. Lee
is whether the trial court properly admitted certain testimony at his trial. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3081 - 2005-03-31
is whether the trial court properly admitted certain testimony at his trial. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3081 - 2005-03-31