Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13761 - 13770 of 82603 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
Search results 13761 - 13770 of 82603 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
[PDF]
State v. Steven W. Nielson
test, and because Nielson consented to that test, we affirm the judgment and order of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5885 - 2017-09-19
test, and because Nielson consented to that test, we affirm the judgment and order of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5885 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the order denying his motion for reconsideration of the circuit court’s DNA testing decision. Based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1097254 - 2026-04-01
the order denying his motion for reconsideration of the circuit court’s DNA testing decision. Based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1097254 - 2026-04-01
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the order denying his motion for reconsideration of the circuit court’s DNA testing decision. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1097254 - 2026-04-01
the order denying his motion for reconsideration of the circuit court’s DNA testing decision. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1097254 - 2026-04-01
State v. Alanna J. Kirt
testing promptly. We hold that she has refused and affirm the order. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12781 - 2005-03-31
testing promptly. We hold that she has refused and affirm the order. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12781 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Alanna J. Kirt
. The order of revocation for unreasonably refusing to take the chemical test is affirmed. By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12781 - 2017-09-21
. The order of revocation for unreasonably refusing to take the chemical test is affirmed. By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12781 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Ralph A. Kalal
. Attorney Kalal appealed the final order of revocation to District IV of the Court of Appeals
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16376 - 2017-09-21
. Attorney Kalal appealed the final order of revocation to District IV of the Court of Appeals
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16376 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Sauk County: GUY D. REYNOLDS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222930 - 2018-10-18
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Sauk County: GUY D. REYNOLDS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222930 - 2018-10-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: DAVID L. BOROWSKI, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144469 - 2017-09-21
from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: DAVID L. BOROWSKI, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144469 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Rudolph L. Jackson
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: JEAN W. DiMOTTO, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6652 - 2017-09-20
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: JEAN W. DiMOTTO, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6652 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and order of the circuit court for Douglas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26635 - 2006-10-02
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and order of the circuit court for Douglas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26635 - 2006-10-02