Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13761 - 13770 of 58595 for speedy trial.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 7, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
. We remand to the trial court for a determination of Barber’s costs and fees, including reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28331 - 2007-03-06

[PDF] Jerome J. Blonien v. Charlotte Fleischman
Law, contrary to § 19.97, STATS.1 Blonien claims that the trial court erred in granting the board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8466 - 2017-09-19

Jerome J. Blonien v. Charlotte Fleischman
Law, contrary to § 19.97, Stats.[1] Blonien claims that the trial court erred in granting the board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8466 - 2005-03-31

Family Services of Barron County, Inc. v. Paul W.
. On remand, the trial court found they were not. Paul and Gary argue the trial court erroneously admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7297 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Eugene A. Pagois
. On appeal, Pagois seeks to have his conviction vacated and remanded for a new trial. Pagois argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9135 - 2017-09-19

State v. Danny W. Filter
that the trial court's refusal to grant a separate trial on the drug charge violated § 971.12(1) or (3), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11234 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Susan A. Wiseman v. Kevin R. Wiseman
on December 18, 2002.1 Among other things, the trial court found that Kevin’s earning capacity was $55,222
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6493 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
and also hold that Weichman’s appeal is frivolous. We remand to the trial court for a determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28331 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Gary L. Radloff
assistance of trial counsel by counsel’s inadequate or limited argument in opposition to the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7429 - 2017-09-20

State v. Eugene C. Lee
is whether the trial court properly admitted certain testimony at his trial. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3081 - 2005-03-31