Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13771 - 13780 of 64736 for b's.

COURT OF APPEALS
reversed. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28723 - 2007-04-16

William J. Faber v. Josephine W. Musser
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: PAUL B. HIGGINBOTHAM, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8878 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Blake K. Saunders v. Derylanne R. Sperry
damage arising out of or resulting from any actual or alleged: a. sexual molestation or contact; b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14623 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
on the left half of the roadway.” Sec. 346.05(1) and (1)(b). Wisconsin Stat. § 346.09 prohibits driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92582 - 2013-02-12

State v. James D.B.
required by Wis. Stat. § 814.61(12)(b) (1997-98).[1] The order was entered following a hearing on a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15914 - 2005-03-31

Bachmann Construction Company v. Alltech Elevator, Inc.
from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: paul b. higginbotham, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13450 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
that the issue lacks merit. Under Wis. Stat. § 757.69(1)(b) (1989-90), “[o]n authority delegated by a judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33999 - 2008-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
of operating after revocation in violation of Wis. Stat. § 343.44(1)(b). He contends that he was improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31159 - 2007-12-12

May a judge participate in writing the script for and performing in a skit to raise money for a charitable organization?
in its performance. B. SCR 60.03(1) and 60.05(1) How might the judge’s participation
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=896 - 2005-03-31

County of Shawano v. Daniel D. McFaul
. § 346.63(1)(b).[2] McFaul contends that because the County failed to produce at the suppression hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2404 - 2005-03-31