Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13771 - 13780 of 69114 for he.
Search results 13771 - 13780 of 69114 for he.
CA Blank Order
was informed of his right to file a response, but he has not done so. After considering the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110219 - 2014-04-08
was informed of his right to file a response, but he has not done so. After considering the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110219 - 2014-04-08
State v. Raymond L. Matzker
(court of appeals case No. 94-3264). He has also appealed from an order denying his motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10096 - 2005-03-31
(court of appeals case No. 94-3264). He has also appealed from an order denying his motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10096 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dion C. Mitchell
a judgment entered after he pled guilty to first-degree recklessly endangering safety, and from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6225 - 2017-09-19
a judgment entered after he pled guilty to first-degree recklessly endangering safety, and from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6225 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, in which he asserted that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517340 - 2022-05-03
, in which he asserted that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517340 - 2022-05-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
order. On the same day, he filed a motion asking the circuit court judge—the Honorable J. Michael
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253346 - 2020-02-04
order. On the same day, he filed a motion asking the circuit court judge—the Honorable J. Michael
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253346 - 2020-02-04
[PDF]
State v. Kentae R.J.
objections because he failed to timely object to any of the alleged deficiencies at the extension hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11424 - 2017-09-19
objections because he failed to timely object to any of the alleged deficiencies at the extension hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11424 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
own defense” but that he was likely to be restored to competency if he were provided with treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923042 - 2025-03-04
own defense” but that he was likely to be restored to competency if he were provided with treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923042 - 2025-03-04
Doris H. Krohn v. Jerome Krohn
the residence Jerome built on the land as exempt from division; (3) Jerome had assets that he did not account
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11326 - 2005-03-31
the residence Jerome built on the land as exempt from division; (3) Jerome had assets that he did not account
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11326 - 2005-03-31
State v. Raymond L. Matzker
(court of appeals case No. 94-3264). He has also appealed from an order denying his motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8366 - 2005-03-31
(court of appeals case No. 94-3264). He has also appealed from an order denying his motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8366 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kentae R.J.
because he failed to timely object to any of the alleged deficiencies at the extension hearing. We also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11424 - 2005-03-31
because he failed to timely object to any of the alleged deficiencies at the extension hearing. We also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11424 - 2005-03-31