Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13771 - 13780 of 46816 for show's.
Search results 13771 - 13780 of 46816 for show's.
COURT OF APPEALS
Virgil with a gun were “not sufficient to show that the weapon was a firearm under th[at] definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95671 - 2013-04-28
Virgil with a gun were “not sufficient to show that the weapon was a firearm under th[at] definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95671 - 2013-04-28
Debra Jungwirth v. Jefferson F. Ray, M.D.
criterion, the supreme court has held that where the plaintiff's evidence shows substantial proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8014 - 2005-03-31
criterion, the supreme court has held that where the plaintiff's evidence shows substantial proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8014 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
’ guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687. Even if a defendant can show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30305 - 2007-09-17
’ guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687. Even if a defendant can show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30305 - 2007-09-17
2008 WI APP 85
Sunrise’s Part 121 renewal on February 8, 2002, and issued an order to show cause. The renewal would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32637 - 2008-06-24
Sunrise’s Part 121 renewal on February 8, 2002, and issued an order to show cause. The renewal would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32637 - 2008-06-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for sentence modification. A trial court may modify a defendant’s sentence upon a showing of a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97212 - 2014-09-15
for sentence modification. A trial court may modify a defendant’s sentence upon a showing of a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97212 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
actual reliance by showing that the court gave “explicit attention” or “specific consideration
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020235 - 2025-10-08
actual reliance by showing that the court gave “explicit attention” or “specific consideration
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020235 - 2025-10-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
preliminary showing that a false statement knowingly and intentionally, or with reckless disregard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987548 - 2025-07-24
preliminary showing that a false statement knowingly and intentionally, or with reckless disregard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987548 - 2025-07-24
COURT OF APPEALS
to show by clear and convincing evidence that any of the claimed misinformation constitutes a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104656 - 2013-11-20
to show by clear and convincing evidence that any of the claimed misinformation constitutes a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104656 - 2013-11-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
support the jury’s verdict, and no expert testimony was required to show that Taylor caused mental harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205929 - 2017-12-20
support the jury’s verdict, and no expert testimony was required to show that Taylor caused mental harm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205929 - 2017-12-20
State v. Jason R. Glascock
elements. ¶6 Glascock argues that the evidence was insufficient to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6581 - 2005-03-31
elements. ¶6 Glascock argues that the evidence was insufficient to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6581 - 2005-03-31