Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13771 - 13780 of 83554 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 13771 - 13780 of 83554 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Douglas Parks
erroneous. Whether a search or seizure passes constitutional muster, however, is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14146 - 2014-09-15
erroneous. Whether a search or seizure passes constitutional muster, however, is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14146 - 2014-09-15
Butterfield Refrigeration v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
in this case differ from the ALJ's findings in degree, not in kind. Both the ALJ's and LIRC's decisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10753 - 2005-03-31
in this case differ from the ALJ's findings in degree, not in kind. Both the ALJ's and LIRC's decisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10753 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 This case stems from an armed robbery of a Kwik Trip in Eau Claire
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213552 - 2018-05-30
. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 This case stems from an armed robbery of a Kwik Trip in Eau Claire
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213552 - 2018-05-30
State v. Douglas Parks
. Whether a search or seizure passes constitutional muster, however, is a question of law that this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14146 - 2005-03-31
. Whether a search or seizure passes constitutional muster, however, is a question of law that this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14146 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. When police executed a search warrant for Baker’s residence, they detected the strong odor of marijuana
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108438 - 2014-03-03
. When police executed a search warrant for Baker’s residence, they detected the strong odor of marijuana
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108438 - 2014-03-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.3 When analyzing a claim that a person was seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872665 - 2024-11-07
protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.3 When analyzing a claim that a person was seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872665 - 2024-11-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circumstances of this case, the court should have presumed that the disputed segment was a public highway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=600520 - 2022-12-13
the circumstances of this case, the court should have presumed that the disputed segment was a public highway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=600520 - 2022-12-13
[PDF]
State v. Ronald C. Smith
. He now appeals. II. DISCUSSION ¶4 The sole issue in this case is whether there was sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4446 - 2017-09-19
. He now appeals. II. DISCUSSION ¶4 The sole issue in this case is whether there was sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4446 - 2017-09-19
Nathaniel Allen Lindell v. Jon E. Litscher
in that case because the facts were undisputed and the court was presented only with a question of law. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6556 - 2005-03-31
in that case because the facts were undisputed and the court was presented only with a question of law. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6556 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject Hammersley’s arguments, and we summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526681 - 2022-06-01
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject Hammersley’s arguments, and we summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526681 - 2022-06-01