Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13771 - 13780 of 21505 for warrants.
Search results 13771 - 13780 of 21505 for warrants.
[PDF]
State v. William J. Kubacki
2 the time of arrest (greater than 0.20%) warranted treating the OWI conviction as an aggravated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11703 - 2017-09-20
2 the time of arrest (greater than 0.20%) warranted treating the OWI conviction as an aggravated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11703 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
and not the exception” and therefore “restitution should be ordered whenever warranted.” State v. Madlock, 230 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91016 - 2012-12-26
and not the exception” and therefore “restitution should be ordered whenever warranted.” State v. Madlock, 230 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91016 - 2012-12-26
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John A. Birdsall
Birdsall's position that none was warranted or that at most, a private reprimand should be imposed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16711 - 2005-03-31
Birdsall's position that none was warranted or that at most, a private reprimand should be imposed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16711 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Terrance M.
of proceedings between the two courts warrant relitigation of the issue; (4) have the burdens of persuasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7644 - 2017-09-19
of proceedings between the two courts warrant relitigation of the issue; (4) have the burdens of persuasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7644 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the sufficiency of the evidence and that these cumulative errors were prejudicial to Hughes and warrant relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1092484 - 2026-03-18
to the sufficiency of the evidence and that these cumulative errors were prejudicial to Hughes and warrant relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1092484 - 2026-03-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
punishment was warranted on the facts of this case. We see no impropriety. ¶13 We also reject Valdez’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209108 - 2018-03-01
punishment was warranted on the facts of this case. We see no impropriety. ¶13 We also reject Valdez’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209108 - 2018-03-01
[PDF]
William F. O'Connor v. Thomas M. Boehlke
that the circumstances in this case do not warrant application of the known present danger exception. The school
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9631 - 2017-09-19
that the circumstances in this case do not warrant application of the known present danger exception. The school
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9631 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Earl A. Drew
tend to refute the factual basis that supported a plea may create a "manifest injustice" warranting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8976 - 2017-09-19
tend to refute the factual basis that supported a plea may create a "manifest injustice" warranting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8976 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
related to the procurement and execution of the search warrant); State v. Colstad, 2003 WI App 25, ¶¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50202 - 2014-09-15
related to the procurement and execution of the search warrant); State v. Colstad, 2003 WI App 25, ¶¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50202 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 125
of analysis may warrant the “great weight” standard of review even when the issue is a matter of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28539 - 2014-09-15
of analysis may warrant the “great weight” standard of review even when the issue is a matter of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28539 - 2014-09-15