Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13781 - 13790 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13781 - 13790 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Todd A. Wild
of law that we review de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102, 104 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12603 - 2017-09-21
of law that we review de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102, 104 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12603 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
.2d 498, 501 (1983) (quoted source omitted). We review de novo, however, whether the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51725 - 2014-09-15
.2d 498, 501 (1983) (quoted source omitted). We review de novo, however, whether the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51725 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
facts are questions of law that this court decides de novo. See Barron Elec. Coop. v. PSC, 212 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180506 - 2017-09-21
facts are questions of law that this court decides de novo. See Barron Elec. Coop. v. PSC, 212 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180506 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
is a question of law that the court reviews de novo. See State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32128 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law that the court reviews de novo. See State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32128 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s conduct and strategy, will not be overturned unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682452 - 2023-07-26
counsel’s conduct and strategy, will not be overturned unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682452 - 2023-07-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or made a conscious effort to suppress exculpatory evidence.” Id. at 69. We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231129 - 2018-12-20
or made a conscious effort to suppress exculpatory evidence.” Id. at 69. We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231129 - 2018-12-20
Thomas Konkel v. Town of Elba Town Board
(1976) (citations omitted). We examine the record de novo and do not defer to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10913 - 2005-03-31
(1976) (citations omitted). We examine the record de novo and do not defer to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10913 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joshua Jenkins
. The determination of whether a seizure has occurred is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Swanson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15367 - 2017-09-21
. The determination of whether a seizure has occurred is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Swanson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15367 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Milwaukee v. John P. Baumgartner
is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. ¶6 Generally, courts have exercised inherent authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4469 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. ¶6 Generally, courts have exercised inherent authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4469 - 2017-09-19
Dana J. Mignognia v. Salvatore Mignognia
review de novo. See Washington v. Washington, 2000 WI 47, ¶26, 234 Wis. 2d 689, 611 N.W.2d 261. A plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5950 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See Washington v. Washington, 2000 WI 47, ¶26, 234 Wis. 2d 689, 611 N.W.2d 261. A plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5950 - 2005-03-31