Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13781 - 13790 of 30097 for de.
Search results 13781 - 13790 of 30097 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
v. Walli, 2011 WI App 86, ¶17, 334 Wis. 2d 402, 799 N.W.2d 898. We review de novo, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78325 - 2012-02-21
v. Walli, 2011 WI App 86, ¶17, 334 Wis. 2d 402, 799 N.W.2d 898. We review de novo, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78325 - 2012-02-21
State v. Neil E. Wakershauser
of a constitutional standard to undisputed facts, and that is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3521 - 2005-03-31
of a constitutional standard to undisputed facts, and that is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3521 - 2005-03-31
Carolyn A. Benson v. City of Ashland
, the reviewing court is obliged to review the evidence de novo to determine whether discretion was properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3060 - 2005-03-31
, the reviewing court is obliged to review the evidence de novo to determine whether discretion was properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3060 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. State v. Walli, 2011 WI App 86, ¶17, 334 Wis. 2d 402, 799 N.W.2d 898. We review de novo, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78325 - 2014-09-15
. State v. Walli, 2011 WI App 86, ¶17, 334 Wis. 2d 402, 799 N.W.2d 898. We review de novo, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78325 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the application of those facts to the statutory standards de novo. Id. ¶12 To extend an involuntary civil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250479 - 2019-11-21
the application of those facts to the statutory standards de novo. Id. ¶12 To extend an involuntary civil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250479 - 2019-11-21
State v. Timmy Duerr
show that a person was under arrest is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11661 - 2005-03-31
show that a person was under arrest is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11661 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. See id. DISCUSSION Factual Basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211858 - 2018-04-26
is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. See id. DISCUSSION Factual Basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211858 - 2018-04-26
[PDF]
State v. Tyrone Price
a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Squires, 211 Wis.2d 876, 880, 565 N.W.2d 309, 311
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15281 - 2017-09-21
a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Squires, 211 Wis.2d 876, 880, 565 N.W.2d 309, 311
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15281 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Eric L. King
constitutional requirements are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. Whether consent to a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26361 - 2017-09-21
constitutional requirements are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. Whether consent to a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26361 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
manner”; and (4) for a “trial de novo.” The trial court denied these motions on January 17, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28331 - 2014-09-15
manner”; and (4) for a “trial de novo.” The trial court denied these motions on January 17, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28331 - 2014-09-15