Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13791 - 13800 of 63750 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] Michele A. Meurer v. Chad Wm. Meurer
and Michele were divorced in April 2001. At that time, custody of their minor children was awarded jointly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6499 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
anything beyond normal anxiety during the stop. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 When we review a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109597 - 2017-09-21

State v. Nilsa I. Huertas
her postconviction motion to vacate the judgment of conviction, or, in the alternative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21565 - 2006-02-27

[PDF] CA Blank Order
efforts to regain custody. Based on the no-merit reports, L.J.’s responses, and our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196855 - 2017-09-27

[PDF] State v. Stanley Martin
of commitment and from the trial court’s order denying his post-verdict motions. Martin argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12174 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, Weiland filed a motion for summary judgment, asserting that because he was not the owner or keeper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184864 - 2017-09-21

Michele A. Meurer v. Chad Wm. Meurer
2001. At that time, custody of their minor children was awarded jointly, with primary physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6499 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
a suppression motion on the basis that his statements made to police during interrogation were involuntary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112453 - 2014-05-12

Wood County Department of Health and Family Services v. Terry L. R.
of the proceeding was tried to a jury. However, in response to the County’s motion, the court answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2676 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Dallas D. Lucas
2 order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7105 - 2017-09-20