Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13791 - 13800 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13791 - 13800 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Arthur B. Patton
statutory and constitutional standards are questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Krier, 165
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5467 - 2017-09-19
statutory and constitutional standards are questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Krier, 165
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5467 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
to the constitutional issue de novo. Id., ¶19; State v. Payano-Roman, 2006 WI 47, ¶16, 290 Wis. 2d 380, 714 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38746 - 2014-09-15
to the constitutional issue de novo. Id., ¶19; State v. Payano-Roman, 2006 WI 47, ¶16, 290 Wis. 2d 380, 714 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38746 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” State v. Grady, 2009 WI 47, ¶13, 317
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000749 - 2025-08-27
the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” State v. Grady, 2009 WI 47, ¶13, 317
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000749 - 2025-08-27
[PDF]
State v. Gary Rach
subject to de novo review. State v. Richardson, 156 Wis.2d 128, 137-38, 456 N.W.2d 830, 833 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9860 - 2017-09-19
subject to de novo review. State v. Richardson, 156 Wis.2d 128, 137-38, 456 N.W.2d 830, 833 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9860 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law, which this court reviews de novo. State v. Thiel, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183414 - 2017-09-21
and prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law, which this court reviews de novo. State v. Thiel, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183414 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Rick E. Norem
factor is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 8. DISCUSSION ¶16 At issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3759 - 2017-09-19
factor is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 8. DISCUSSION ¶16 At issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3759 - 2017-09-19
State v. Derrick E. Hopkins
; however, we review de novo a trial court’s conclusion whether a stop and search comported with the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4502 - 2005-03-31
; however, we review de novo a trial court’s conclusion whether a stop and search comported with the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4502 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
conclusions: great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review. Brown v. LIRC, 2003 WI 142
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98714 - 2013-07-01
conclusions: great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review. Brown v. LIRC, 2003 WI 142
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98714 - 2013-07-01
City of Shullsburg v. Ronald L. Monahan
the constitutional question of whether Strause had probable cause to arrest Monahan de novo. See State v. Babbit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13387 - 2005-03-31
the constitutional question of whether Strause had probable cause to arrest Monahan de novo. See State v. Babbit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13387 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
court’s conclusion of law de novo. Baierl v. McTaggart, 2001 WI 107, ¶14, 245 Wis. 2d 632, 629 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56876 - 2014-09-15
court’s conclusion of law de novo. Baierl v. McTaggart, 2001 WI 107, ¶14, 245 Wis. 2d 632, 629 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56876 - 2014-09-15