Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1381 - 1390 of 30070 for de.
Search results 1381 - 1390 of 30070 for de.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and detached magistrate” is a question of constitutional fact that we review de novo. State v. Neuaone, 2005
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92654 - 2014-09-15
and detached magistrate” is a question of constitutional fact that we review de novo. State v. Neuaone, 2005
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92654 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Byron A. Anderson
satisfy the constitutional requirement of reasonableness presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18439 - 2017-09-21
satisfy the constitutional requirement of reasonableness presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18439 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Antonio L. Ford
erred by denying his motion without explanation, and that we should therefore review the motion de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2936 - 2017-09-19
erred by denying his motion without explanation, and that we should therefore review the motion de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2936 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
by Escalona-Naranjo presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140271 - 2015-04-21
by Escalona-Naranjo presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140271 - 2015-04-21
COURT OF APPEALS
: linda m. van de water, Judge. Modified and, as modified, affirmed. Before Brown, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66710 - 2011-06-28
: linda m. van de water, Judge. Modified and, as modified, affirmed. Before Brown, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66710 - 2011-06-28
[PDF]
State v. Luis A. Martinez
fact unless they are clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo a trial court’s conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5273 - 2017-09-19
fact unless they are clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo a trial court’s conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5273 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
evaluate de novo whether a traffic stop violates a driver’s constitutional rights. Post, 2007 WI 60, ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53667 - 2014-09-15
evaluate de novo whether a traffic stop violates a driver’s constitutional rights. Post, 2007 WI 60, ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53667 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Allan D. Schopper
who concluded that the refusal was unreasonable. Schopper made a request for a de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11672 - 2017-09-19
who concluded that the refusal was unreasonable. Schopper made a request for a de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11672 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
for the reasonable attorney’s fees of his independent counsel. ¶4 We review summary judgment de novo applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36192 - 2009-04-15
for the reasonable attorney’s fees of his independent counsel. ¶4 We review summary judgment de novo applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36192 - 2009-04-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to undisputed facts and that is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Foust, 214 Wis. 2d 568, 571
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33255 - 2008-07-01
to undisputed facts and that is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Foust, 214 Wis. 2d 568, 571
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33255 - 2008-07-01