Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1381 - 1390 of 64779 for records.

COURT OF APPEALS
was held in July 2010. The record on appeal contains the trial transcript but does not contain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64288 - 2011-05-17

[PDF] CA Blank Order
our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253023 - 2020-01-28

[PDF] NOTICE
to correct 181 alleged errors in the trial court record. We consolidated the appeals and now affirm both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34307 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and supplemental no-merit reports, Davis’s response, and our independent review of the record,2 we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237143 - 2019-03-13

COURT OF APPEALS
alleged errors in the trial court record. We consolidated the appeals and now affirm both orders. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34307 - 2008-10-14

COURT OF APPEALS
records all references to a case in which Geurts entered a plea of no contest to disorderly conduct, after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131221 - 2014-12-03

COURT OF APPEALS
are admissible under Wis. Stat. § 908.03(6) (2011-12),[1] the hearsay exception for records of regularly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100808 - 2013-08-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for records of a regularly conducted activity, set forth in WIS. STAT. § 908.03(6) (2011-12). 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123002 - 2014-10-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. § 908.03(6) (2011-12), 1 the hearsay exception for records of regularly conducted activity. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100808 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
inadmissible hearsay and by admitting two loan documents under the exception to the hearsay rule for records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123002 - 2014-10-01