Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1381 - 1390 of 5295 for texte.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
out she had been using another student’s cell phone to send text messages. V.A.L. testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102038 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI 46
that the person does not meet the criteria for commitment No. 2008AP52 9 on the text
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51070 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Frontsheet
U.S. at 221. ¶26 A comparison of the text of the statutory standard with the constitutional
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242179 - 2019-08-13

[PDF] Aurora Medical Group v. Department of Workforce Development
. at 654). Since pre-emption turns on congressional intent, we look first to the text of ERISA. "[W]e
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17406 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 61
” is unambiguous in this context. To the contrary, as noted in the text above, closely related statutes may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=714113 - 2023-12-19

[PDF] State v. Mark E. Nelson
as they are ascertainable from the text and structure of the statute itself. Id., ¶48. We do so in part because words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25275 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
student’s cell phone to send text messages. V.A.L. testified that Lowe took her into the teachers’ lounge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102038 - 2013-09-17

[PDF] Frontsheet
of an unambiguous statute as long as the scope, context, and purpose are ascertainable from the text
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168034 - 2017-09-21

[PDF]
, although some aspects of Jones’ interpretation are reasonable in light of the text of these three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801788 - 2024-05-28

Frontsheet
of evidence by ignoring an essential part of the text. Rather, applying the plain words of the entire text, I
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29150 - 2007-05-21