Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13801 - 13810 of 68875 for he.
Search results 13801 - 13810 of 68875 for he.
CA Blank Order
moved to withdraw his pleas on the basis that he did not understand the nature of the charges
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98930 - 2013-07-09
moved to withdraw his pleas on the basis that he did not understand the nature of the charges
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98930 - 2013-07-09
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 971.08 (1995-96); consequently, he is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing to explore whether he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33960 - 2008-10-06
. § 971.08 (1995-96); consequently, he is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing to explore whether he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33960 - 2008-10-06
[PDF]
State v. Stephen S.
parental rights to Christina S., and Erik S. He raises five issues. This court affirms. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11009 - 2017-09-19
parental rights to Christina S., and Erik S. He raises five issues. This court affirms. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11009 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report, and he has 1 All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=519466 - 2022-05-10
report, and he has 1 All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=519466 - 2022-05-10
CA Blank Order
for between ten and seventeen minutes; the interrogation was recorded. Zabala told them that he lived
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95094 - 2013-04-02
for between ten and seventeen minutes; the interrogation was recorded. Zabala told them that he lived
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95094 - 2013-04-02
COURT OF APPEALS
of Oconomowoc Police Department testified that on November 21, 2007, at approximately 11:35 p.m., he was on his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36470 - 2009-05-12
of Oconomowoc Police Department testified that on November 21, 2007, at approximately 11:35 p.m., he was on his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36470 - 2009-05-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
allowed him to stay with her because he “was at my house with all of his stuff” and it “was apparent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=424921 - 2021-09-14
allowed him to stay with her because he “was at my house with all of his stuff” and it “was apparent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=424921 - 2021-09-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
Department testified that on November 21, 2007, at approximately 11:35 p.m., he was on his way to back up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36470 - 2014-09-15
Department testified that on November 21, 2007, at approximately 11:35 p.m., he was on his way to back up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36470 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. § 971.08 (1995-96); consequently, he is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing to explore whether he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33960 - 2014-09-15
. § 971.08 (1995-96); consequently, he is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing to explore whether he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33960 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
in full. ¶6 On appeal, Geyer argues that he is entitled to plea withdrawal under both State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107613 - 2014-06-04
in full. ¶6 On appeal, Geyer argues that he is entitled to plea withdrawal under both State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107613 - 2014-06-04