Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13801 - 13810 of 44408 for name change.

COURT OF APPEALS
was based on errors of law or has been superseded by intervening changes in the law. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33678 - 2008-08-06

[PDF] Milwaukee District Council 48 v. City of Milwaukee
, the City modified its procedures for collecting leaves and assigning salting routes, and these changes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15841 - 2017-09-21

State v. Rhea F.
submits that the conditions for return must relate to changes in her behavior or home environment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3468 - 2005-03-31

Milwaukee District Council 48 v. City of Milwaukee
, and these changes adversely affected members of the union.[2] The union contended that these modifications violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15841 - 2005-03-31

2007 WI APP 262
whether, in light of LIRC’s changes in position on the issue since 1986, we should accord any deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31005 - 2007-12-18

COURT OF APPEALS
attorney’s office, and (3) failed to seek a change of venue despite pretrial publicity. The State opposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33716 - 2008-08-12

[PDF] LMMIA, LLC v. State of Wisconsin, Division of Hearings and Appeals
manner, DOT communicated that, in light of changed circumstances, it planned to move the median
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25716 - 2017-09-21

State v. Rhea F.
submits that the conditions for return must relate to changes in her behavior or home environment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3467 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Belinda Snopek v. Lakeland Medical Center
893.80(1m). Lakeland Medical Center is upset that due to this legislative change, it has to defend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11872 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Kevin P. Sullivan
in this case, namely the defendant's intent or absence of accident. The other acts evidence is dissimilar
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17141 - 2017-09-21