Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13811 - 13820 of 82603 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
opinion and order: 2020AP561-CRNM State of Wisconsin v. Milton L. Wright (L. C
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=608361 - 2023-01-10

[PDF] CA Blank Order
are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2019AP1041-CRNM
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277918 - 2020-08-13

[PDF] CA Blank Order
54603 You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754813 - 2024-01-25

COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Outagamie County: Mark J. McGinnis, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123043 - 2014-10-06

[PDF] Wisconsin Supreme Court oral argument - October
, and an order denying post-conviction relief. In 2013 Barnes was charged with delivering greater than 50
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopsoct2022.pdf - 2022-09-29

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - October 2022
, and an order denying post-conviction relief. In 2013 Barnes was charged with delivering greater than 50
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573579 - 2022-09-29

[PDF] State v. Ryan E. Brockman
, Brockman's HGN test result is significant evidence. The trial court's order barred its admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9283 - 2017-09-19

State v. Ryan E. Brockman
for operating under the influence, Brockman's HGN test result is significant evidence. The trial court's order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9287 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ryan E. Brockman
for operating under the influence, Brockman's HGN test result is significant evidence. The trial court's order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9285 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ryan E. Brockman
for operating under the influence, Brockman's HGN test result is significant evidence. The trial court's order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9283 - 2005-03-31