Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13821 - 13830 of 30175 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13821 - 13830 of 30175 for consulta de causas.
State v. Jerome W.
of statutes is a legal issue subject to our de novo review. State v. April O., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20227 - 2005-12-21
of statutes is a legal issue subject to our de novo review. State v. April O., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20227 - 2005-12-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to avoid the procedural bar is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183369 - 2017-09-21
to avoid the procedural bar is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183369 - 2017-09-21
County of Walworth v. Glen E. Kelly
court’s conclusions of law and decides these matters de novo.” State v. Dunn, 158 Wis.2d 138, 142, 462
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12103 - 2005-03-31
court’s conclusions of law and decides these matters de novo.” State v. Dunn, 158 Wis.2d 138, 142, 462
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12103 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ronald Waites
of law which we review de novo. See id. To establish prejudice, a defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9966 - 2017-09-19
of law which we review de novo. See id. To establish prejudice, a defendant must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9966 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counterclaim rule apply to a given set of facts are questions of law that we review de novo. Menard, Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=441079 - 2021-10-13
counterclaim rule apply to a given set of facts are questions of law that we review de novo. Menard, Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=441079 - 2021-10-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law subject to de novo review.” State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30, 360 Wis. 2d 522, 849 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913342 - 2025-02-11
of law subject to de novo review.” State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30, 360 Wis. 2d 522, 849 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913342 - 2025-02-11
Shawn Krenke v. Timothy Krenke
commissioner declined to find Timothy in contempt. Shawn sought de novo review of the decision in the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10585 - 2005-03-31
commissioner declined to find Timothy in contempt. Shawn sought de novo review of the decision in the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10585 - 2005-03-31
Jandrin Electric, Inc. v. Abel Electric, Inc.
Velle v. De Luca, 48 Wis. 2d 464, 469, 180 N.W.2d 710 (1970). When this type of contract occurs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6558 - 2005-03-31
Velle v. De Luca, 48 Wis. 2d 464, 469, 180 N.W.2d 710 (1970). When this type of contract occurs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6558 - 2005-03-31
City of Nekoosa v. Steven J. Melin
questions of law which we review de novo. See State v. Sutton, 177 Wis.2d 709, 713, 503 N.W.2d 326, 328 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15652 - 2005-03-31
questions of law which we review de novo. See State v. Sutton, 177 Wis.2d 709, 713, 503 N.W.2d 326, 328 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15652 - 2005-03-31
City of Shullsburg v. Ronald L. Monahan
the constitutional question of whether Strause had probable cause to arrest Monahan de novo. See State v. Babbit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13387 - 2005-03-31
the constitutional question of whether Strause had probable cause to arrest Monahan de novo. See State v. Babbit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13387 - 2005-03-31