Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13821 - 13830 of 19292 for transfer by affidavit.
Search results 13821 - 13830 of 19292 for transfer by affidavit.
Juneau County v. Courthouse Employees
ordered Juneau County to file “affidavits or other materials it may choose to file relating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11506 - 2005-03-31
ordered Juneau County to file “affidavits or other materials it may choose to file relating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11506 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Randolph S. Miller
amended the insufficient complaints. Miller subsequently submitted affidavits that provided a factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5564 - 2017-09-19
amended the insufficient complaints. Miller subsequently submitted affidavits that provided a factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5564 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Randolph S. Miller
amended the insufficient complaints. Miller subsequently submitted affidavits that provided a factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5568 - 2017-09-19
amended the insufficient complaints. Miller subsequently submitted affidavits that provided a factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5568 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. Accompanying the defendants-respondents’ motion for summary judgment was an affidavit of defense counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31591 - 2008-01-22
. Accompanying the defendants-respondents’ motion for summary judgment was an affidavit of defense counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31591 - 2008-01-22
Sandra L. Shirk v. Bowling, Inc.
, was prepared to defend against Shirk's complaint, and filed a brief, with supporting affidavits, opposing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17466 - 2005-03-31
, was prepared to defend against Shirk's complaint, and filed a brief, with supporting affidavits, opposing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17466 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 801.15(2), based on “excusable neglect as set forth in the accompanying affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673524 - 2023-06-29
. § 801.15(2), based on “excusable neglect as set forth in the accompanying affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673524 - 2023-06-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from toxic exposure to the drug. Notably, the defense presented a signed affidavit by Hook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=659795 - 2023-05-23
from toxic exposure to the drug. Notably, the defense presented a signed affidavit by Hook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=659795 - 2023-05-23
[PDF]
WI App 22
“if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258303 - 2020-06-15
“if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258303 - 2020-06-15
[PDF]
Marjorie (Grimes) Mount v. Dennis Grimes
at that hearing. There are conflicting affidavits of Grimes' attorney and of corporation counsel, prepared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8795 - 2017-09-19
at that hearing. There are conflicting affidavits of Grimes' attorney and of corporation counsel, prepared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8795 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in error. Owners submitted an affidavit from Douglas Eveleth, an Owners business analyst, who stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118787 - 2014-09-15
in error. Owners submitted an affidavit from Douglas Eveleth, an Owners business analyst, who stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118787 - 2014-09-15