Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13831 - 13840 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13831 - 13840 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
State v. Abdullah Refeeq Beyah
, subject to de novo review, see Powell v. State, 86 Wis.2d 51, 62-68, 271 N.W.2d 610, 615-18 (1978
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10431 - 2005-03-31
, subject to de novo review, see Powell v. State, 86 Wis.2d 51, 62-68, 271 N.W.2d 610, 615-18 (1978
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10431 - 2005-03-31
Susan M. Oimoen (O'Kane) v. Steven C. Oimoen
and not isolated activities within this state.” Oimoen sought a de novo hearing in circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13023 - 2005-03-31
and not isolated activities within this state.” Oimoen sought a de novo hearing in circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13023 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Foresight, Inc v. Daniel Babl
nonconforming use is a question of law that we review de novo. Waukesha County v. Seitz, 140 Wis.2d 111
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11086 - 2017-09-19
nonconforming use is a question of law that we review de novo. Waukesha County v. Seitz, 140 Wis.2d 111
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11086 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Standard of Review ¶5 We review the circuit court’s decision on summary judgment de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139741 - 2017-09-21
Standard of Review ¶5 We review the circuit court’s decision on summary judgment de novo, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139741 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Darrell J. Shearer
decide de novo. State v. Kasian, 207 Wis. 2d 611, 621, 558 N.W.2d 687 (Ct. App. 1996). Our task
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3739 - 2017-09-19
decide de novo. State v. Kasian, 207 Wis. 2d 611, 621, 558 N.W.2d 687 (Ct. App. 1996). Our task
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3739 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. See State v. Baron, 2009 WI 58, ¶10, 318 Wis. 2d 60, 769 N.W.2d 34
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245224 - 2019-08-21
that we review de novo. See State v. Baron, 2009 WI 58, ¶10, 318 Wis. 2d 60, 769 N.W.2d 34
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245224 - 2019-08-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
“[t]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15524 - 2017-09-21
“[t]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15524 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
supports the legal standard for protective placement is a question of law, which is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103934 - 2017-09-21
supports the legal standard for protective placement is a question of law, which is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103934 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Marcus M.
were reasonable is one we review de novo. See id. Using these standards, we review first the stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15694 - 2017-09-21
were reasonable is one we review de novo. See id. Using these standards, we review first the stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15694 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. The circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197490 - 2017-10-10
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. The circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197490 - 2017-10-10