Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13841 - 13850 of 24582 for WA 0859 3970 0884 Total Biaya Renovasi Rumah Dengan Kredit Pakis Kab Magelang.
Search results 13841 - 13850 of 24582 for WA 0859 3970 0884 Total Biaya Renovasi Rumah Dengan Kredit Pakis Kab Magelang.
[PDF]
NOTICE
totaling $38,728.34, and (5) the possibility that restitution ordered could be converted into a civil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40576 - 2014-09-15
totaling $38,728.34, and (5) the possibility that restitution ordered could be converted into a civil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40576 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Scott G. Hagerman
to the issues on appeal. No. 2005AP565-CR 4 considering the totality of the circumstances set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20322 - 2017-09-21
to the issues on appeal. No. 2005AP565-CR 4 considering the totality of the circumstances set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20322 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
-disposition court opined: I think in looking at the totality of the record, that the State has met
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32404 - 2014-09-15
-disposition court opined: I think in looking at the totality of the record, that the State has met
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32404 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Trace J. McKay
was conducted on December 15, 1997. The State requested the maximum sentences totaling six years. During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14956 - 2017-09-21
was conducted on December 15, 1997. The State requested the maximum sentences totaling six years. During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14956 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the mathematics mistakenly gives “$413.38” as the total. [2] Wisconsin Stat. § 109.03(5) provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60798 - 2011-03-07
the mathematics mistakenly gives “$413.38” as the total. [2] Wisconsin Stat. § 109.03(5) provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60798 - 2011-03-07
COURT OF APPEALS
in treatment, “or the cause of the differential treatment is a ‘totally illegitimate animus’ toward
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85112 - 2013-05-21
in treatment, “or the cause of the differential treatment is a ‘totally illegitimate animus’ toward
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85112 - 2013-05-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on the totality of the evidence against Ford, there was not a reasonable probability that the proffered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936976 - 2025-04-08
on the totality of the evidence against Ford, there was not a reasonable probability that the proffered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936976 - 2025-04-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for a cumulative total of more than six months pursuant to court orders containing the termination of parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016020 - 2025-09-30
for a cumulative total of more than six months pursuant to court orders containing the termination of parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016020 - 2025-09-30
COURT OF APPEALS
in. The court sentenced Osinski to a total of eleven years of initial confinement and thirteen years of extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62911 - 2011-04-19
in. The court sentenced Osinski to a total of eleven years of initial confinement and thirteen years of extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62911 - 2011-04-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
in the outcome.” Id. at 694. The prejudice determination considers “the totality of the evidence before
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=971667 - 2025-06-18
in the outcome.” Id. at 694. The prejudice determination considers “the totality of the evidence before
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=971667 - 2025-06-18