Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13851 - 13860 of 84318 for case number.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
, with Daniels inserting his name, case number, date of plea, circuit court judge and attorney information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28489 - 2007-03-19

[PDF] The Third Branch, winter 2006
check to ensure that the numbers tell the full story. The weighted caseload numbers are meant
/news/thirdbranch/docs/winter06.pdf - 2009-12-02

Daniel Steinbach v. Green Lake Sanitary District
in a number of ways, depending on the facts of the particular case. For example, while it is true
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25426 - 2006-06-05

[PDF] Richard R. Rayburn v. MSI Insurance Company
were persuaded by a number of cases in other jurisdictions that held the same phrase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2400 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
of the State’s case, that the prosecutor’s misconduct during closing argument merits reversal of the jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87464 - 2012-09-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
his motion to dismiss at the close of the State’s case, that the prosecutor’s misconduct during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87464 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 80
2021 WI App 80 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2020AP2028
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=439895 - 2021-12-09

[PDF] The Town of Dayton v. The Waupaca County Zoning Board of Adjustment
a gravel pit for a number of years. Carew’s operations are a “conditional use” within the applicable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4584 - 2017-09-19

The Town of Dayton v. The Waupaca County Zoning Board of Adjustment
a gravel pit for a number of years. Carew’s operations are a “conditional use” within the applicable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4584 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
it to be “no longer equitable that the judgment in [the child support] case should have prospective application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816427 - 2024-06-20