Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13861 - 13870 of 63555 for records/1000.
Search results 13861 - 13870 of 63555 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
, and the need to protect the public. Id. at 623. It also may consider the defendant’s past criminal record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50757 - 2010-06-08
, and the need to protect the public. Id. at 623. It also may consider the defendant’s past criminal record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50757 - 2010-06-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208237 - 2018-02-14
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208237 - 2018-02-14
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion by imposing an excessive sentence. Because the record reflects that the trial court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29468 - 2007-06-25
discretion by imposing an excessive sentence. Because the record reflects that the trial court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29468 - 2007-06-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently reviewed the record and the no-merit 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133040 - 2017-09-21
independently reviewed the record and the no-merit 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133040 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250718 - 2019-11-25
independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250718 - 2019-11-25
State v. Major C. Latimer
not unduly harsh in light of Latimer’s prior criminal record. Accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15782 - 2005-03-31
not unduly harsh in light of Latimer’s prior criminal record. Accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15782 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 32
guilty at that last moment, when he really wanted to go to trial. The record reflects that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31233 - 2014-09-15
guilty at that last moment, when he really wanted to go to trial. The record reflects that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31233 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report, Weller’s response, and our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119139 - 2014-09-15
of the no-merit report, Weller’s response, and our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119139 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
not responded. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96730 - 2014-09-15
not responded. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96730 - 2014-09-15
City of Sheboygan v. Korry L. Ardell
as the other pending cases.” The prosecutor then put on the record the agreement the City and Ardell had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26068 - 2006-08-01
as the other pending cases.” The prosecutor then put on the record the agreement the City and Ardell had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26068 - 2006-08-01