Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13861 - 13870 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 13861 - 13870 of 58285 for speedy trial.
State v. Angela J.
, Joseph C.B.[2] She contends that the trial court erred by upholding the jury verdict when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2633 - 2005-03-31
, Joseph C.B.[2] She contends that the trial court erred by upholding the jury verdict when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2633 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to narrow the issues for trial, the circuit court made several additional findings at the return hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=438338 - 2021-10-13
to narrow the issues for trial, the circuit court made several additional findings at the return hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=438338 - 2021-10-13
COURT OF APPEALS
not make any specific recommendation but would instead leave the sentence up to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58772 - 2011-01-10
not make any specific recommendation but would instead leave the sentence up to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58772 - 2011-01-10
[PDF]
WI APP 123
the homicide conviction. Myrick contends that the trial court erroneously allowed the State to read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101433 - 2017-09-21
the homicide conviction. Myrick contends that the trial court erroneously allowed the State to read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101433 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Bruce Rivers
a jury trial. On appeal, Rivers raises four arguments; he claims that the trial court: (1) erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15301 - 2017-09-21
a jury trial. On appeal, Rivers raises four arguments; he claims that the trial court: (1) erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15301 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
recommendation but would instead leave the sentence up to the trial court’s discretion. ¶4 At the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58772 - 2014-09-15
recommendation but would instead leave the sentence up to the trial court’s discretion. ¶4 At the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58772 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 8, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
order and to hold a new fact-finding and dispositional hearing on the basis of ineffectiveness of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28051 - 2007-02-07
order and to hold a new fact-finding and dispositional hearing on the basis of ineffectiveness of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28051 - 2007-02-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a jury trial of three drug-related charges and two counts of felony bail jumping and from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257595 - 2020-04-15
a jury trial of three drug-related charges and two counts of felony bail jumping and from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257595 - 2020-04-15
Rick J. Guerard v. Daimler Chrysler Motors Corp.
immunity. They ask this court to exercise its discretion under Wis. Stat. § 752.35 to grant a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5019 - 2005-03-31
immunity. They ask this court to exercise its discretion under Wis. Stat. § 752.35 to grant a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5019 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel R. F.
for postconviction relief. He argues that his conviction should be overturned because (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3235 - 2005-03-31
for postconviction relief. He argues that his conviction should be overturned because (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3235 - 2005-03-31