Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13861 - 13870 of 58509 for speedy trial.
Search results 13861 - 13870 of 58509 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, depending on the outcome of the investigation into the Florence County prior conviction. 3 The trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135438 - 2017-09-21
, depending on the outcome of the investigation into the Florence County prior conviction. 3 The trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135438 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Mayfield Pennington
the judgment of conviction entered following a jury trial for one count of facilitating sexual No. 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16273 - 2017-09-21
the judgment of conviction entered following a jury trial for one count of facilitating sexual No. 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16273 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Staffa complains the trial court erroneously permitted him to proceed pro se and made inappropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34503 - 2014-09-15
. Staffa complains the trial court erroneously permitted him to proceed pro se and made inappropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34503 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
witnesses violated his right of confrontation; the trial transcript was inadequate, thereby resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95346 - 2005-03-31
witnesses violated his right of confrontation; the trial transcript was inadequate, thereby resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95346 - 2005-03-31
WI App 68 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP901-CR Complete Titl...
to a new trial because the trial court permitted the State to show the jury a video in which a detective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82177 - 2012-06-26
to a new trial because the trial court permitted the State to show the jury a video in which a detective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82177 - 2012-06-26
[PDF]
Judith E. Smriga v. Paul S. Smriga
Smriga appeals from the trial court’s judgment awarding Judith Smriga, his former wife, $475 per month
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13765 - 2014-09-15
Smriga appeals from the trial court’s judgment awarding Judith Smriga, his former wife, $475 per month
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13765 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
motion to vacate the DNA surcharge allegedly imposed at sentencing. Carr argues that the trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91469 - 2013-01-15
motion to vacate the DNA surcharge allegedly imposed at sentencing. Carr argues that the trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91469 - 2013-01-15
Judith E. Smriga v. Paul S. Smriga
and Roggensack, JJ. PER CURIAM. Paul Smriga appeals from the trial court’s judgment awarding Judith Smriga
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13765 - 2005-03-31
and Roggensack, JJ. PER CURIAM. Paul Smriga appeals from the trial court’s judgment awarding Judith Smriga
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13765 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy Armstrong
Armstrong argues: (1) that the trial court erred in excluding polygraph evidence from the hearing on his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14178 - 2014-09-15
Armstrong argues: (1) that the trial court erred in excluding polygraph evidence from the hearing on his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14178 - 2014-09-15
State v. Leonard J. LaRoche, Jr.
expired by its terms before the trial court ordered extension, and could not thereafter be extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2295 - 2005-03-31
expired by its terms before the trial court ordered extension, and could not thereafter be extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2295 - 2005-03-31