Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13871 - 13880 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13871 - 13880 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Chad D. Everts
was not entered knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently is a question of constitutional fact that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5473 - 2017-09-19
was not entered knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently is a question of constitutional fact that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5473 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, as the joint amicus brief of the Workers’ Rights Center and Voces de la Frontera points out, LIRC has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169971 - 2017-09-21
, as the joint amicus brief of the Workers’ Rights Center and Voces de la Frontera points out, LIRC has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169971 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Michelle L. Peters v. Joseph A. Peters
unless he owned his stock. ¶4 Michelle presented the testimony of Thomas Zoeller, owner of De Pere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3909 - 2017-09-20
unless he owned his stock. ¶4 Michelle presented the testimony of Thomas Zoeller, owner of De Pere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3909 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92069 - 2014-09-15
that we review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92069 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 301 Wis. 2d 1, ¶8; Hughes, 233 Wis. 2d 280, ¶15. In the second step, we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184943 - 2017-09-21
, 301 Wis. 2d 1, ¶8; Hughes, 233 Wis. 2d 280, ¶15. In the second step, we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184943 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
is met de novo. Id. Neither party argues that the findings of the trial court are clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31948 - 2008-02-27
is met de novo. Id. Neither party argues that the findings of the trial court are clearly erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31948 - 2008-02-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
that the [WFMLA] has been relatively unlitigated[,]” and thus review should be de novo. We disagree. In Jicha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27873 - 2007-01-22
that the [WFMLA] has been relatively unlitigated[,]” and thus review should be de novo. We disagree. In Jicha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27873 - 2007-01-22
State v. Randy A. Davis
to the effective assistance of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5835 - 2005-03-31
to the effective assistance of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5835 - 2005-03-31
Brown County v. Robert W. Burch, Jr.
that is reviewed de novo. See City of La Crosse v. Richling, 178 Wis.2d 856, 858, 505 N.W.2d 448, 449 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15419 - 2005-03-31
that is reviewed de novo. See City of La Crosse v. Richling, 178 Wis.2d 856, 858, 505 N.W.2d 448, 449 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15419 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thong L. Soun
they are clearly erroneous …. We then independently apply the law to those facts de novo.” State v. Hughes, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21078 - 2006-01-30
they are clearly erroneous …. We then independently apply the law to those facts de novo.” State v. Hughes, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21078 - 2006-01-30