Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13871 - 13880 of 69114 for he.
Search results 13871 - 13880 of 69114 for he.
COURT OF APPEALS
with which he was charged. Because we conclude that the trial court’s decision to deny the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76240 - 2012-01-09
with which he was charged. Because we conclude that the trial court’s decision to deny the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76240 - 2012-01-09
State v. Henry J. Brookshire
postconviction motions. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective and that the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9257 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motions. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective and that the trial court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9257 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with which he was charged. Because we conclude that the trial court’s decision to deny the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76240 - 2014-09-15
with which he was charged. Because we conclude that the trial court’s decision to deny the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76240 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
suspicion to believe that he had committed a traffic violation. In the alternative, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34265 - 2014-09-15
suspicion to believe that he had committed a traffic violation. In the alternative, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34265 - 2014-09-15
State v. Peter D. Grefsheim
concentration should have been suppressed because he requested, but did not receive, a second successful test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14954 - 2005-03-31
concentration should have been suppressed because he requested, but did not receive, a second successful test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14954 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stephen S.
S., and Erik S. He raises five issues. This court affirms. The State filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11009 - 2005-03-31
S., and Erik S. He raises five issues. This court affirms. The State filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11009 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2016AP2337 2 Smith entered a plea agreement with the State pursuant to which he agreed to plead
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208680 - 2018-02-16
. No. 2016AP2337 2 Smith entered a plea agreement with the State pursuant to which he agreed to plead
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208680 - 2018-02-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the establishment of a guardianship or his need for protective placement. Instead, he argues: (1) the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314220 - 2020-12-16
the establishment of a guardianship or his need for protective placement. Instead, he argues: (1) the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314220 - 2020-12-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Hospital “to check on” Reynolds. Reynolds told Deputy Schiro that he was operating his motorcycle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192020 - 2017-09-21
Hospital “to check on” Reynolds. Reynolds told Deputy Schiro that he was operating his motorcycle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192020 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
Moore testified as follows. He was on patrol within the city limits of the City of Boscobel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27165 - 2014-09-15
Moore testified as follows. He was on patrol within the city limits of the City of Boscobel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27165 - 2014-09-15