Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13871 - 13880 of 69114 for he.
Search results 13871 - 13880 of 69114 for he.
[PDF]
State v. Steven J. Keizer
motion for postconviction relief. He argues that the trial court's modification of the involuntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8226 - 2017-09-19
motion for postconviction relief. He argues that the trial court's modification of the involuntary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8226 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
moved to withdraw his pleas on the basis that he did not understand the nature of the charges
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98930 - 2013-07-09
moved to withdraw his pleas on the basis that he did not understand the nature of the charges
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98930 - 2013-07-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
. § 971.08 (1995-96); consequently, he is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing to explore whether he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33960 - 2014-09-15
. § 971.08 (1995-96); consequently, he is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing to explore whether he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33960 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and driver’s license information for no apparent reason. We conclude Folkman has failed to establish he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105544 - 2013-12-16
and driver’s license information for no apparent reason. We conclude Folkman has failed to establish he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105544 - 2013-12-16
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. Postconviction, Deichsel successfully moved to withdraw his pleas on the basis that he did not understand
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98930 - 2014-09-15
. Postconviction, Deichsel successfully moved to withdraw his pleas on the basis that he did not understand
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98930 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. First, he argues that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=451553 - 2021-11-11
. First, he argues that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=451553 - 2021-11-11
[PDF]
State v. Donald J. Draves
), STATS., to which he was sentenced to three years probation with the condition that six months be served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10720 - 2017-09-20
), STATS., to which he was sentenced to three years probation with the condition that six months be served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10720 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the trial court made two procedural errors that entitle him to a reversal of the convictions. First, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31914 - 2014-09-15
that the trial court made two procedural errors that entitle him to a reversal of the convictions. First, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31914 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
after a jury found him guilty of third-degree sexual assault. He contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985938 - 2025-07-23
after a jury found him guilty of third-degree sexual assault. He contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985938 - 2025-07-23
COURT OF APPEALS
with which he was charged. Because we conclude that the trial court’s decision to deny the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76240 - 2012-01-09
with which he was charged. Because we conclude that the trial court’s decision to deny the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76240 - 2012-01-09