Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13871 - 13880 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Search results 13871 - 13880 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Neil F. Jennings v. Marlys J. Jennings
Jennings. The trial court reduced Neil’s obligation from $2000 per month to $590 per month. Neil contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15751 - 2005-03-31
Jennings. The trial court reduced Neil’s obligation from $2000 per month to $590 per month. Neil contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15751 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of his right to a public trial and (2) he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47128 - 2010-02-16
of his right to a public trial and (2) he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47128 - 2010-02-16
[PDF]
State v. Gary Bryant
., and from the trial court's NOS. 97-0064-CR & 97-0882-CR 2 order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12276 - 2017-09-21
., and from the trial court's NOS. 97-0064-CR & 97-0882-CR 2 order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12276 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jonathan Moen
., and from the trial court’s order denying him postconviction relief. He was convicted by a six-person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14943 - 2017-09-21
., and from the trial court’s order denying him postconviction relief. He was convicted by a six-person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14943 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Francis E. Yohnk v. Klara Yohnk
that the trial court erred because it failed to consider the partnership's income and failed to award her one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9320 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court erred because it failed to consider the partnership's income and failed to award her one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9320 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
did not resolve the prejudice, and that he should get a new trial. We hold that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48541 - 2010-03-30
did not resolve the prejudice, and that he should get a new trial. We hold that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48541 - 2010-03-30
Judith E. Smriga v. Paul S. Smriga
and Roggensack, JJ. PER CURIAM. Paul Smriga appeals from the trial court’s judgment awarding Judith Smriga
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13765 - 2005-03-31
and Roggensack, JJ. PER CURIAM. Paul Smriga appeals from the trial court’s judgment awarding Judith Smriga
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13765 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Judith E. Smriga v. Paul S. Smriga
Smriga appeals from the trial court’s judgment awarding Judith Smriga, his former wife, $475 per month
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13765 - 2014-09-15
Smriga appeals from the trial court’s judgment awarding Judith Smriga, his former wife, $475 per month
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13765 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
motion to vacate the DNA surcharge allegedly imposed at sentencing. Carr argues that the trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91469 - 2013-01-15
motion to vacate the DNA surcharge allegedly imposed at sentencing. Carr argues that the trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91469 - 2013-01-15
State v. Maria S.
children within twelve months under § 48.415(2) (2001-02);[3] and (2) the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6813 - 2005-03-31
children within twelve months under § 48.415(2) (2001-02);[3] and (2) the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6813 - 2005-03-31