Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13881 - 13890 of 30134 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] State v. Russell Stokes
was deficient and prejudicial is reviewed de novo. Id. at 128, 448 N.W.2d at 848. In applying the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9219 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
statutes to a set of facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Arends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88073 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
change in circumstances is a matter of law we review de novo.” Id., ¶25. However, we give weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267975 - 2020-07-09

Gerald T. Carroll v. Town of Balsam Lake
the decision of the trial court de novo. See Local No. 695 v. LIRC, 154 Wis.2d 75, 82, 452 N.W.2d 368, 371
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10718 - 2005-03-31

2008 WI APP 63
of law de novo, we often give agency decisions increasing degrees of deference, from due weight to great
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32110 - 2008-04-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on this issue is de novo.” State v. Sugden, 2010 WI App 166, ¶16, 330 Wis. 2d 628, 795 N.W.2d 456
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131736 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
modification is a question of law we review de novo. Id. A defendant bears the burden of proving by clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85979 - 2012-08-14

[PDF] State v. James R. Bolstad
of the parties." State v. Prince, 147 Wis.2d 134, 136, 432 N.W.2d 646, 647 (Ct. App. 1988). We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8484 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same methodology employed by the circuit court. Brownelli v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115439 - 2014-07-01

[PDF] State v. Jonathan R. Torres
Whether something constitutes a new factor is a question of law we review de novo, without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6101 - 2017-09-19