Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13881 - 13890 of 98495 for court records search online.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the record reveals the circuit court acted fairly, impartially, and without bias. The court merely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170585 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.” “The purpose of the writ is to give the [circuit] court an opportunity to correct its own record of an error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=777747 - 2024-03-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
findings and the record, that the court found Kayla to be dangerous under § 51.20(1)(a)2.d. ¶2 We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=552097 - 2022-08-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
BACKGROUND ¶4 The following facts, taken from the record before the circuit court, are undisputed. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757697 - 2024-03-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 21, 2023 Samuel A. Christensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=743224 - 2023-12-21

Lawrence E. Diez v. Oneida County Child Support Agency
,” and was not realistic in his search for a job. The court found Diez had not made “a good-faith attempt to maintain full
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15191 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
OFFICE OF THE CLERK WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS 110 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 215 P.O
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059342 - 2026-01-05

[PDF] CA Blank Order
OFFICE OF THE CLERK WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS 110 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 215 P.O
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059342 - 2026-01-05

[PDF] City of Eau Claire v. Kimberly M. Langenfeld
testimony. Based on the record, this court cannot conclude the trial court’s acceptance of Birtzer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3628 - 2017-09-19

City of Eau Claire v. Kimberly M. Langenfeld
to accept Birtzer’s testimony. Based on the record, this court cannot conclude the trial court’s acceptance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3628 - 2005-03-31