Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13881 - 13890 of 46086 for paternity test paper work.

COURT OF APPEALS
to request field sobriety tests. We disagree, and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 At the suppression hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101941 - 2013-09-16

State v. Kris A. Westberg
field sobriety tests, and Westberg responded that he had hurt his knee or heel in a basketball game
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7525 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Catherine M. Parrilli
an order holding that Catherine M. Parrilli’s refusal to submit to an evidentiary chemical test of her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17867 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
on false positive drug tests and her admission to an earlier relapse, and that the court erred by relying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218621 - 2018-08-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
be assessed separately and by a distinct test, as all such functions are not ‘judged by the same standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173688 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Michael W. Carlson
court erred by failing to perform the three-part test for admissibility set out in State v. Sullivan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14876 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
when it limited inquiry into whether the physical evidence had been DNA tested. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36107 - 2009-04-06

Elizabeth D. Swenson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
-part test described in Brantner v. Jenson, 121 Wis. 2d 658, 668, 360 N.W.2d 529 (1985). However, we do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15808 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the crash was inaccurate. Waterman contends that his BAC was .182 when tested by the State Hygiene Lab
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157817 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Malcolm, Inc. v. Eau Claire County Board of Land Use Appeals
an area variance, essentially overruling the test for an area variance set forth in Kenosha County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19364 - 2017-09-21