Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13891 - 13900 of 30137 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13891 - 13900 of 30137 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. David R. Messner
99-2116-CR 3 a question of law which we review de novo. See id. at 236-37. We need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15553 - 2017-09-21
99-2116-CR 3 a question of law which we review de novo. See id. at 236-37. We need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15553 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Todd E. Crider
review de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565 N.W.2d 506 (1997). No. 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15465 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565 N.W.2d 506 (1997). No. 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15465 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
findings of fact, upholding them unless they are clearly erroneous, and then review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886293 - 2024-12-10
findings of fact, upholding them unless they are clearly erroneous, and then review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886293 - 2024-12-10
State v. John R. Jagusch
inducement exists is a question of law we review de novo. See Kersten v. H.C. Prange Co., 186 Wis.2d 49, 56
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11783 - 2005-03-31
inducement exists is a question of law we review de novo. See Kersten v. H.C. Prange Co., 186 Wis.2d 49, 56
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11783 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence Northern
de novo. State v. Schroeder, 2000 WI App 128, ¶8, 237 Wis. 2d 575, No. 03-0246-CR 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6107 - 2017-09-19
de novo. State v. Schroeder, 2000 WI App 128, ¶8, 237 Wis. 2d 575, No. 03-0246-CR 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6107 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id. ¶8 The circuit court’s conclusion that Andrews’ encounter with Cali
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131971 - 2014-12-22
review de novo. Id. ¶8 The circuit court’s conclusion that Andrews’ encounter with Cali
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131971 - 2014-12-22
COURT OF APPEALS
broadly written that his decision in effect established a de facto policy in the District.” ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31685 - 2008-01-30
broadly written that his decision in effect established a de facto policy in the District.” ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31685 - 2008-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS
to constitutional principles is a question of law we review de novo. Id.; State v. Verhagen, 2013 WI App 16, ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112277 - 2014-05-13
to constitutional principles is a question of law we review de novo. Id.; State v. Verhagen, 2013 WI App 16, ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112277 - 2014-05-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
3 Whether counsel’s performance is deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82768 - 2014-09-15
3 Whether counsel’s performance is deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82768 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the recording. Our review of the application of the balancing test is de novo. Id., ¶14. Nevertheless, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150270 - 2017-09-21
the recording. Our review of the application of the balancing test is de novo. Id., ¶14. Nevertheless, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150270 - 2017-09-21