Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13891 - 13900 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13891 - 13900 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Melissa Newkirk v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
appeal raises a question of law—the interpretation and application of a statute—which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14640 - 2005-03-31
appeal raises a question of law—the interpretation and application of a statute—which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14640 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. State v. Tiepelman, 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d 179, 717 N.W.2d 1. A defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90901 - 2014-09-15
de novo. State v. Tiepelman, 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d 179, 717 N.W.2d 1. A defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90901 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reviews de novo the circuit court’s interpretation of WIS. STAT. § 173.24. State v. Leitner, 2002 WI 77
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149553 - 2017-09-21
reviews de novo the circuit court’s interpretation of WIS. STAT. § 173.24. State v. Leitner, 2002 WI 77
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149553 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. However, we review the court’s application of constitutional principles to those findings de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145329 - 2017-09-21
. However, we review the court’s application of constitutional principles to those findings de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145329 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Todd A. Wild
of law that we review de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102, 104 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12603 - 2017-09-21
of law that we review de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102, 104 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12603 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on certiorari review, a court does not reweigh the evidence; certiorari is not a de novo review. See Roberts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350062 - 2021-03-30
on certiorari review, a court does not reweigh the evidence; certiorari is not a de novo review. See Roberts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350062 - 2021-03-30
2008 WI APP 92
to the IRA. Our review is de novo because this appeal involves only questions of law and the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32735 - 2008-06-24
to the IRA. Our review is de novo because this appeal involves only questions of law and the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32735 - 2008-06-24
[PDF]
Society Insurance v. Phil Linehan
judgment decision de novo, applying the same standard as the circuit court. See Grams v. Boss, 97 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2177 - 2017-09-19
judgment decision de novo, applying the same standard as the circuit court. See Grams v. Boss, 97 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2177 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
). The trial court denied the motion. This appeal followed. ¶3 We review de novo the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27380 - 2014-09-15
). The trial court denied the motion. This appeal followed. ¶3 We review de novo the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27380 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J., Anderson and Reilly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64800 - 2014-09-15
for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J., Anderson and Reilly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64800 - 2014-09-15