Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13891 - 13900 of 29996 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a constitutional issue that an appellate court reviews de novo.” Ibid. A defendant who seeks resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79392 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Linda Goldbeck v. Roger Martin
. There was credible evidence that both knew about the dangerous condition of the yard. The Goldbecks’ de facto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11570 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Joseph S. Makhlouf v. Michael J. Kern
5 II. ANALYSIS. Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11159 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 2015. Witten appeals. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185884 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
A challenge to the lawfulness of a police-initiated stop presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28602 - 2014-09-15

Washington County v. Carl J. Wagner
this court reviews de novo. Chernetski v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 183 Wis. 2d 68, 72, 515 N.W.2d 283
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26373 - 2006-09-05

[PDF] State v. Brett R.T.
to undisputed facts. This presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Keith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13475 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same methodology employed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542869 - 2022-07-13

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a reason sufficient to avoid the procedural bar is a question of law for our de novo review. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186887 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
question we review de novo. See id., 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d at 185, 717 N.W.2d at 3. ¶10 Notably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104443 - 2013-11-18