Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13891 - 13900 of 68776 for had.
Search results 13891 - 13900 of 68776 for had.
State v. Vincent E. Smith
and the maximum penalties he faced. When the trial court inquired whether Smith had reviewed the charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2571 - 2005-03-31
and the maximum penalties he faced. When the trial court inquired whether Smith had reviewed the charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2571 - 2005-03-31
Whitecaps Homes, Inc. v. Kenosha County Board of Review
that the “front foot” method was utilized in determining value; because these lots had not been improved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11063 - 2005-03-31
that the “front foot” method was utilized in determining value; because these lots had not been improved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11063 - 2005-03-31
Margaret Jane Kozlowicz v. Jeffrey David Schwartz
concluded, among other things, that Jeffrey had a gross imputed monthly income of $4,116.00, which included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9386 - 2005-03-31
concluded, among other things, that Jeffrey had a gross imputed monthly income of $4,116.00, which included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9386 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Spickler Enterprises, Ltd. v. Department of Revenue
. The Commission concluded that Spickler had not reasonably relied on any action by the DOR in failing to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12220 - 2017-09-21
. The Commission concluded that Spickler had not reasonably relied on any action by the DOR in failing to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12220 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Whitecaps Homes, Inc. v. Kenosha County Board of Review
value; because these lots had not been improved, the value arrived at was then reduced by 50%. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11063 - 2017-09-19
value; because these lots had not been improved, the value arrived at was then reduced by 50%. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11063 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Willie E. Johnson
that the State failed to show probable cause that he had committed a felony. 1 The court commissioner agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14592 - 2017-09-21
that the State failed to show probable cause that he had committed a felony. 1 The court commissioner agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14592 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Aaron N.
3 ¶5 Aaron called a social worker who had filed a report disfavoring waiver. The social worker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6671 - 2017-09-20
3 ¶5 Aaron called a social worker who had filed a report disfavoring waiver. The social worker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6671 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Pringle, Jr.
paychecks totaling $1,566.89. Pringle had cashed those checks at Appleton Piggly Wiggly stores in June
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26448 - 2017-09-21
paychecks totaling $1,566.89. Pringle had cashed those checks at Appleton Piggly Wiggly stores in June
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26448 - 2017-09-21
Richard G. Gaboda v. Correne A. Gaboda
the property division equalization payment he had been ordered to pay to his former wife, Correne Gaboda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20382 - 2005-11-22
the property division equalization payment he had been ordered to pay to his former wife, Correne Gaboda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20382 - 2005-11-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Stefan Range, who was an acquaintance of Royster and had previously purchased marijuana from Royster
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219059 - 2018-09-13
Stefan Range, who was an acquaintance of Royster and had previously purchased marijuana from Royster
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219059 - 2018-09-13