Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13891 - 13900 of 58509 for speedy trial.
Search results 13891 - 13900 of 58509 for speedy trial.
Rick J. Guerard v. Daimler Chrysler Motors Corp.
immunity. They ask this court to exercise its discretion under Wis. Stat. § 752.35 to grant a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5019 - 2005-03-31
immunity. They ask this court to exercise its discretion under Wis. Stat. § 752.35 to grant a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5019 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 8, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
order and to hold a new fact-finding and dispositional hearing on the basis of ineffectiveness of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28051 - 2007-02-07
order and to hold a new fact-finding and dispositional hearing on the basis of ineffectiveness of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28051 - 2007-02-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
recommendation but would instead leave the sentence up to the trial court’s discretion. ¶4 At the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58772 - 2014-09-15
recommendation but would instead leave the sentence up to the trial court’s discretion. ¶4 At the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58772 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
a new fact-finding and dispositional hearing on the basis of ineffectiveness of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28051 - 2014-09-15
a new fact-finding and dispositional hearing on the basis of ineffectiveness of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28051 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. He claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to cross-examine two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=319650 - 2021-01-05
for postconviction relief. He claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to cross-examine two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=319650 - 2021-01-05
[PDF]
State v. Bruce Rivers
a jury trial. On appeal, Rivers raises four arguments; he claims that the trial court: (1) erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15301 - 2017-09-21
a jury trial. On appeal, Rivers raises four arguments; he claims that the trial court: (1) erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15301 - 2017-09-21
State v. Angela J.
, Joseph C.B.[2] She contends that the trial court erred by upholding the jury verdict when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2633 - 2005-03-31
, Joseph C.B.[2] She contends that the trial court erred by upholding the jury verdict when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2633 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bruce Rivers
to Wis. Stat. § 948.02(1) (1997‑98),[1] entered following a jury trial. On appeal, Rivers raises four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15301 - 2005-03-31
to Wis. Stat. § 948.02(1) (1997‑98),[1] entered following a jury trial. On appeal, Rivers raises four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15301 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel R. F.
(1) the trial court erroneously denied his motion to dismiss a second count of first- degree sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3235 - 2017-09-19
(1) the trial court erroneously denied his motion to dismiss a second count of first- degree sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3235 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
right of confrontation by the admission of his late daughter’s suicide note at trial. He also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546694 - 2022-07-27
right of confrontation by the admission of his late daughter’s suicide note at trial. He also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546694 - 2022-07-27