Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13901 - 13910 of 34724 for in n.

[PDF] State v. Jacqueline J. Beattie
they are open or closed. Belton, 453 U.S. at 460 n.4, 461–462. Significantly, in both Belton and Fry, as here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10744 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
court is bound by clear language of a statute), and precedent, State v. Lee, 157 Wis. 2d 126, 130 n.4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35407 - 2009-02-03

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not filed a response disputing that point. See id., ¶4 n.5 (a postconviction motion for plea withdrawal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157733 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
. Dodgeville Mut. Ins. Co., 212 Wis. 2d 226, 232, 568 N.W.2d 31 (Ct. App. 1997). When an essential element
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59100 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
v. McAttee, 2001 WI App 262, ¶5 n.1, 248 Wis. 2d 865, 637 N.W.2d 774 (“It is the appellant’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=649545 - 2023-04-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
seeking relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. “‘[I]n a postconviction setting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96182 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
WI App 231, ¶7 n.1, 239 Wis. 2d 96, 619 N.W.2d 289. No. 2013AP1042-CRNM 3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119691 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
otherwise noted. [2] Because Justices Ann Walsh Bradley, N. Patrick Crooks, and Louis B. Butler joined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110195 - 2014-04-14

Frontsheet
:1.4(a).[1] The referee reasoned that “[n]either [the district attorney’s] negligence, nor
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35598 - 2009-02-15

COURT OF APPEALS
opined that the defendant should be the one to decide. Ambrehl, 145 Wis. 2d at 355-56 n.4. However, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37750 - 2009-07-15