Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13901 - 13910 of 58285 for speedy trial.

[PDF] State v. Reinaldo C. Acosta
, Anthony Howell, to identify him at trial due to flaws in Howell’s prior identifications. He also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19911 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Quinton K. Washington
postconviction motion. Washington claims that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10844 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
hearing at which the State’s expert witness testified, the trial court denied Sweeney’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28031 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Larry A. Peterson
relief. Peterson argues that he should be granted a new trial in the interest of justice because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3399 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Frank Starich
-trial motions including one to “dismiss for lack of probable cause.” The motion stated that Starich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3041 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Rodney Rowsey v. Kenneth Morgan
of counsel at a parole revocation proceeding, and that the trial court, therefore, erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12614 - 2017-09-21

Calumet County Health & Social Services v. Michael J.R.
) is unconstitutional as a violation of substantive due process is waived. His argument that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4240 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Mareese Anderson
that the trial court erred in denying his motion because: (1) the court failed to recognize his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11809 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] David M. Iushewitz v. Milwaukee County PersonnelReview Board
the length of his suspension. The Board claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8541 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
into custody the day before and that his trial counsel’s performance was constitutionally ineffective because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45608 - 2010-01-12