Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13911 - 13920 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13911 - 13920 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
to the factual findings de novo. See Casarez, 314 Wis. 2d 661, ¶9. ¶6 The principles of law governing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39222 - 2009-08-10
to the factual findings de novo. See Casarez, 314 Wis. 2d 661, ¶9. ¶6 The principles of law governing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39222 - 2009-08-10
COURT OF APPEALS
, which is reviewed de novo. Walworth Cnty. v. Therese B., 2003 WI App 223, ¶21, 267 Wis. 2d 310, 671 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103934 - 2013-11-06
, which is reviewed de novo. Walworth Cnty. v. Therese B., 2003 WI App 223, ¶21, 267 Wis. 2d 310, 671 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103934 - 2013-11-06
COURT OF APPEALS
, which this court reviews de novo. State v. Douglas D., 2001 WI 47, ¶14, 243 Wis. 2d 204, 626 N.W.2d 725
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92099 - 2013-01-29
, which this court reviews de novo. State v. Douglas D., 2001 WI 47, ¶14, 243 Wis. 2d 204, 626 N.W.2d 725
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92099 - 2013-01-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” State v. Grady, 2009 WI 47, ¶13, 317
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000749 - 2025-08-27
the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” State v. Grady, 2009 WI 47, ¶13, 317
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000749 - 2025-08-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous standard; next, we review whether the facts meet the legal test for “hardship” de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73769 - 2014-09-15
erroneous standard; next, we review whether the facts meet the legal test for “hardship” de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73769 - 2014-09-15
State v. Joseph Allen Hopkins
issue that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Wagner, 191 Wis.2d 322, 328, 528 N.W.2d 85, 87 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7785 - 2005-03-31
issue that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Wagner, 191 Wis.2d 322, 328, 528 N.W.2d 85, 87 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7785 - 2005-03-31
Washington County v. Carl J. Wagner
this court reviews de novo. Chernetski v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 183 Wis. 2d 68, 72, 515 N.W.2d 283
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26373 - 2006-09-05
this court reviews de novo. Chernetski v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 183 Wis. 2d 68, 72, 515 N.W.2d 283
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26373 - 2006-09-05
Kohler Company v. The Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York
.[5] We review decisions on summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8688 - 2005-03-31
.[5] We review decisions on summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8688 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Todd E. Crider
review de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565 N.W.2d 506 (1997). No. 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15465 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565 N.W.2d 506 (1997). No. 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15465 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
3 Whether counsel’s performance is deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82768 - 2014-09-15
3 Whether counsel’s performance is deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82768 - 2014-09-15