Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13911 - 13920 of 17266 for probate/1000.
Search results 13911 - 13920 of 17266 for probate/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2021-22).1 We affirm. These proceedings arise from the probate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726647 - 2023-11-09
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2021-22).1 We affirm. These proceedings arise from the probate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726647 - 2023-11-09
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. 3 This was Lee’s first adult criminal conviction, but he was placed on probation three times
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98452 - 2014-09-15
. 3 This was Lee’s first adult criminal conviction, but he was placed on probation three times
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98452 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
) provides, in relevant part: When imposing sentence or ordering probation for any crime … for which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141769 - 2015-05-18
) provides, in relevant part: When imposing sentence or ordering probation for any crime … for which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141769 - 2015-05-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2021-22).1 We affirm. These proceedings arise from the probate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726647 - 2023-11-09
. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2021-22).1 We affirm. These proceedings arise from the probate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726647 - 2023-11-09
State v. Vernon L. Hubbard
and placed him on probation for two years. ¶3 In his suppression motion, Hubbard argued before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4707 - 2005-03-31
and placed him on probation for two years. ¶3 In his suppression motion, Hubbard argued before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4707 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, including why it determined that probation was not a viable option. In imposing sentence, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906580 - 2025-01-29
, including why it determined that probation was not a viable option. In imposing sentence, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906580 - 2025-01-29
[PDF]
State v. Michael H.
was sentenced to jail for one year, plus probation. See id. at 683. No. 00-0627 7 significant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2348 - 2017-09-19
was sentenced to jail for one year, plus probation. See id. at 683. No. 00-0627 7 significant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2348 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, at Murrell’s probation revocation hearing. There, Davis testified that he had not actually seen Murrell drop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71362 - 2014-09-15
, at Murrell’s probation revocation hearing. There, Davis testified that he had not actually seen Murrell drop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71362 - 2014-09-15
State v. Eugene G.
and placed him on probation. Several months later, Eugene G. was found delinquent again, and for this new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6692 - 2005-03-31
and placed him on probation. Several months later, Eugene G. was found delinquent again, and for this new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6692 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bradford J. May
obligations, whether on probation, juvenile supervision or when testifying. Because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12390 - 2017-09-21
obligations, whether on probation, juvenile supervision or when testifying. Because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12390 - 2017-09-21