Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13911 - 13920 of 30329 for up.
Search results 13911 - 13920 of 30329 for up.
Jeffrey Schwigel v. David J. Kohlmann
called Schwigel and told him to pick up his equipment or it would be scrapped. When Dunfee opened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7345 - 2005-03-31
called Schwigel and told him to pick up his equipment or it would be scrapped. When Dunfee opened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7345 - 2005-03-31
Kenneth Urman v. Brian Barron
at an outdoor picnic table. The bartender broke up the dispute and escorted Urman inside. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4176 - 2005-03-31
at an outdoor picnic table. The bartender broke up the dispute and escorted Urman inside. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4176 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lori W.
“opened the door” to the State’s follow-up questioning, which elicited the challenged response. Second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6936 - 2005-03-31
“opened the door” to the State’s follow-up questioning, which elicited the challenged response. Second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6936 - 2005-03-31
State v. Craig A. Sussek
,” and he did not see how “parad[ing] eight, or ten, or twelve [witnesses], or even the Pope himself up [t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13265 - 2005-03-31
,” and he did not see how “parad[ing] eight, or ten, or twelve [witnesses], or even the Pope himself up [t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13265 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard A. Moeck
because the trial court left the mistrial decision up to the State. The hearing in this case falls short
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6012 - 2005-03-31
because the trial court left the mistrial decision up to the State. The hearing in this case falls short
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6012 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
) would still allow probation for up to six OWIs because even though a sixth OWI is a Class H felony
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117139 - 2017-09-21
) would still allow probation for up to six OWIs because even though a sixth OWI is a Class H felony
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117139 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Response of Intervenors-Petitioners Nathan Atkinson et al. to Motion for Reconsideration
with state election laws in the lead up to an election—is well established.”). Case 2023AP001399
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0104intervenors.pdf - 2024-01-05
with state election laws in the lead up to an election—is well established.”). Case 2023AP001399
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0104intervenors.pdf - 2024-01-05
[PDF]
WI 10
high school career, Halter tried to sign up for a junior varsity event before regionals and serve his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=938831 - 2025-04-08
high school career, Halter tried to sign up for a junior varsity event before regionals and serve his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=938831 - 2025-04-08
[PDF]
Frontsheet
could be placed on supervision for up to 30 years. [THE STATE]: Sixty years is the maximum
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238262 - 2019-05-30
could be placed on supervision for up to 30 years. [THE STATE]: Sixty years is the maximum
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238262 - 2019-05-30
Frontsheet
with up to one year of jail confinement as a condition; 3. withhold sentence, and place the person
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117139 - 2014-07-14
with up to one year of jail confinement as a condition; 3. withhold sentence, and place the person
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117139 - 2014-07-14