Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13921 - 13930 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13921 - 13930 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
Melissa Newkirk v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
appeal raises a question of law—the interpretation and application of a statute—which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14640 - 2005-03-31
appeal raises a question of law—the interpretation and application of a statute—which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14640 - 2005-03-31
Eau Claire County v. Michael J. Asher
the applicability of a zoning ordinance to a given set of facts is a question of law we review de novo. County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10290 - 2005-03-31
the applicability of a zoning ordinance to a given set of facts is a question of law we review de novo. County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10290 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Margaret C.
a question of law this court reviews de novo. See Patricia A.P., 195 Wis.2d at 862, 537 N.W.2d at 49-50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14792 - 2017-09-21
a question of law this court reviews de novo. See Patricia A.P., 195 Wis.2d at 862, 537 N.W.2d at 49-50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14792 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law subject to de novo review.” State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30, 360 Wis. 2d 522, 849 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913342 - 2025-02-11
of law subject to de novo review.” State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30, 360 Wis. 2d 522, 849 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913342 - 2025-02-11
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether those facts satisfy the standard of probable cause. Renz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37033 - 2009-07-01
they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether those facts satisfy the standard of probable cause. Renz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37033 - 2009-07-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
.2d 498, 501 (1983) (quoted source omitted). We review de novo, however, whether the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51725 - 2014-09-15
.2d 498, 501 (1983) (quoted source omitted). We review de novo, however, whether the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51725 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Lynn Morrissey
are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll, 2000 WI 130, ¶29, 248 Wis. 2d 662
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16836 - 2017-09-21
are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll, 2000 WI 130, ¶29, 248 Wis. 2d 662
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16836 - 2017-09-21
Tony A. Henderson v. Milwaukee County
presents a question of law subject to our de novo review. See Damaschke, 150 Wis.2d at 283, 441 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9548 - 2005-03-31
presents a question of law subject to our de novo review. See Damaschke, 150 Wis.2d at 283, 441 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9548 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
by the [circuit] court meet the constitutional standard” is reviewed de novo. State v. Hindsley, 2000 WI App 130
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143503 - 2015-06-24
by the [circuit] court meet the constitutional standard” is reviewed de novo. State v. Hindsley, 2000 WI App 130
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143503 - 2015-06-24
State v. Bernard A. James
. Whether a fact or set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law, decided by this court de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4022 - 2005-03-31
. Whether a fact or set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law, decided by this court de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4022 - 2005-03-31