Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13921 - 13930 of 24594 for extending.
Search results 13921 - 13930 of 24594 for extending.
CA Blank Order
and extended supervision. We agree with appellate counsel that there would be no arguable merit to a challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97084 - 2013-05-21
and extended supervision. We agree with appellate counsel that there would be no arguable merit to a challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97084 - 2013-05-21
[PDF]
State v. Enrique Vizcaino
. The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the traffic stop was unreasonably extended beyond its original
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25988 - 2017-09-21
. The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the traffic stop was unreasonably extended beyond its original
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25988 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
totaling fifty years, consisting of forty years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104405 - 2017-09-21
totaling fifty years, consisting of forty years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104405 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a five-year term, consisting of two years’ initial confinement and three years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=482042 - 2022-02-08
a five-year term, consisting of two years’ initial confinement and three years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=482042 - 2022-02-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement to be followed by fifteen years of extended supervision. Ford opted to pursue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936976 - 2025-04-08
of initial confinement to be followed by fifteen years of extended supervision. Ford opted to pursue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936976 - 2025-04-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement to be followed by twelve years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742950 - 2023-12-27
confinement to be followed by twelve years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742950 - 2023-12-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, extended the deadline for him to file his brief. We could have summarily reversed the judgment based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252033 - 2020-01-07
, extended the deadline for him to file his brief. We could have summarily reversed the judgment based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252033 - 2020-01-07
State v. Lamont Williams
was not extended. Therefore, a violation of the ex post facto clause did not occur. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7146 - 2005-03-31
was not extended. Therefore, a violation of the ex post facto clause did not occur. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7146 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of initial confinement, followed by four years of extended supervision. Brown filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=685266 - 2023-08-01
years of initial confinement, followed by four years of extended supervision. Brown filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=685266 - 2023-08-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ stated concern for additional victims and their own safety, TEU officers reasonably extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795684 - 2024-05-07
’ stated concern for additional victims and their own safety, TEU officers reasonably extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795684 - 2024-05-07