Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13931 - 13940 of 64246 for educator arrested 13th bail hearing "2013-2023".

David J. Peterson v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance Company
of education, experience or training and because the finding of the circuit court is not clearly erroneous, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5117 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] David J. Peterson v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance Company
occupation by reason of education, experience or training and because the finding of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5117 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
) allowing him to proceed without an attorney at the disposition hearing, thereby depriving him of the right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28749 - 2007-04-18

COURT OF APPEALS
the only witnesses to testify at the hearing on Estrada’s motion to suppress. The relevant facts from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121323 - 2014-09-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
as a result of a search incident to arrest. The State argues that the circuit court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197095 - 2017-09-28

State v. Thomas L. Leck
been granted because the police officer did not have probable cause to arrest him for this crime. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10119 - 2005-03-31

State v. Matthew J. Lazarewicz
the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress which challenged the legality of his arrest. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3252 - 2005-03-31

State v. Scott E. Frye
as a repeater, and third-offense drunk driving. He claims that police (1) arrested him for obstructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10832 - 2005-03-31

State v. Scott E. Frye
as a repeater, and third-offense drunk driving. He claims that police (1) arrested him for obstructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10831 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
from an “illegal arrest”; (2) not presenting two items of evidence at his Miranda/Goodchild hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1024376 - 2025-10-21