Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13931 - 13940 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
Search results 13931 - 13940 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 974.06 motion for plea withdrawal, claiming his pleas were not knowingly, intelligently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93884 - 2013-03-11
. Stat. § 974.06 motion for plea withdrawal, claiming his pleas were not knowingly, intelligently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93884 - 2013-03-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to a claim that the circuit court misused its sentencing discretion. The circuit court imposed three
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219642 - 2018-09-20
to a claim that the circuit court misused its sentencing discretion. The circuit court imposed three
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219642 - 2018-09-20
Accu-Tech Plastics, Inc. v. Midwest Microform Industries, Inc.
on damages. The court concluded that, although a hearing on damages would be required in a tort claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5508 - 2005-03-31
on damages. The court concluded that, although a hearing on damages would be required in a tort claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5508 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court determined that Maddox’s claims were procedurally barred by State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86885 - 2012-09-10
. The circuit court determined that Maddox’s claims were procedurally barred by State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86885 - 2012-09-10
State v. Donald F. Sheffey
for postconviction relief. Sheffey argues that: (1) he was not allowed to present evidence in support of his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24910 - 2006-04-26
for postconviction relief. Sheffey argues that: (1) he was not allowed to present evidence in support of his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24910 - 2006-04-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that Gerken’s claims are procedurally barred under State v. Allen, 2010 WI 89, 328 Wis. 2d 1, 786 N.W.2d 124
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116706 - 2017-09-21
that Gerken’s claims are procedurally barred under State v. Allen, 2010 WI 89, 328 Wis. 2d 1, 786 N.W.2d 124
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116706 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2009-10).1 We reject Ringold’s claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93581 - 2014-09-15
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2009-10).1 We reject Ringold’s claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93581 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 17, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
discretion when it denied his ineffective assistance of counsel claim without conducting an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26775 - 2006-10-16
discretion when it denied his ineffective assistance of counsel claim without conducting an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26775 - 2006-10-16
Walgenmeyer's Carpet & Tile Co. v. Robert Schultz
. DEININGER, J.[1] Robert Schultz appeals from a small claims judgment for $1,049 plus costs in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11589 - 2005-03-31
. DEININGER, J.[1] Robert Schultz appeals from a small claims judgment for $1,049 plus costs in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11589 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was a secured creditor and that there was no equity in the property. Dumke claims Wheeler was an unsecured
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33164 - 2008-06-23
was a secured creditor and that there was no equity in the property. Dumke claims Wheeler was an unsecured
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33164 - 2008-06-23