Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13931 - 13940 of 63985 for records/1000.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the record as required by Anders, we summarily affirm the judgment because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252235 - 2020-01-07

[PDF] City of Madison v. Vincent N. Spruill, Jr.
of Spruill’s driving behaviors and the time of day. We affirm the decision because the record before us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6810 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
postconviction motion. 2 Based on our review of the record and the briefs, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204230 - 2017-11-28

COURT OF APPEALS
a personal, on-the-record colloquy with him regarding waiver of his right to testify mandates a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31738 - 2008-02-04

[PDF] State v. Kenyatta Thigpen
introduction via a motion in limine. He cites us to 43:31-33 of the record. We have reviewed that portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16038 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
an excessive sentence. Because the record reflects that the trial court considered the proper sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29468 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
independently reviewed the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). This court agrees
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=442015 - 2021-10-19

[PDF] State v. Bradley W. Sexton
argued that Sexton’s record was artificially inflated because some of the convictions were too remote
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4899 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250718 - 2019-11-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was to be imposed unless the court found a compelling reason not to do so and placed that reason on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015087 - 2025-09-25