Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13941 - 13950 of 30109 for de.
Search results 13941 - 13950 of 30109 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 233 (Ct. App. 1994) (“construction of a statute presents a question of law, subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101565 - 2017-09-21
.2d 233 (Ct. App. 1994) (“construction of a statute presents a question of law, subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101565 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Leonard Bendlin
review of the trial court’s determination that Bendlin was “in custody” is de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13630 - 2017-09-21
review of the trial court’s determination that Bendlin was “in custody” is de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13630 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jamie Lee Moore
our duty to independently review the record and search for trial court error, with a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9928 - 2017-09-19
our duty to independently review the record and search for trial court error, with a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9928 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 140
that we review de novo. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA v. Green, 2008 WI App 78, ¶11, 311 Wis. 2d 715, 753
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54492 - 2014-09-15
that we review de novo. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA v. Green, 2008 WI App 78, ¶11, 311 Wis. 2d 715, 753
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54492 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous and review de novo whether those facts necessitated suppression. State v. Bullock, 2014 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199157 - 2017-10-26
erroneous and review de novo whether those facts necessitated suppression. State v. Bullock, 2014 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199157 - 2017-10-26
State v. Steven T. Moore
probable cause is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 356, 525
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17853 - 2005-04-26
probable cause is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d 349, 356, 525
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17853 - 2005-04-26
State v. Roger M. Smejkal
presenting a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Coolidge, 173 Wis. 2d 783, 789, 496 N.W.2d 701
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6600 - 2005-03-31
presenting a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Coolidge, 173 Wis. 2d 783, 789, 496 N.W.2d 701
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6600 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Wisconsin Constitutions is a question of law we No. 2015AP1196-CR 4 review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163180 - 2017-09-21
and Wisconsin Constitutions is a question of law we No. 2015AP1196-CR 4 review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163180 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Gregory W. Schaefer v. Barbara Conway
a question of law that we review de novo. See Jacobson v. American Tool Cos., Inc., 222 Wis. 2d 384, 393
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20047 - 2017-09-21
a question of law that we review de novo. See Jacobson v. American Tool Cos., Inc., 222 Wis. 2d 384, 393
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20047 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We uphold the circuit court’s findings of fact unless clearly erroneous, though we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130180 - 2017-09-21
. We uphold the circuit court’s findings of fact unless clearly erroneous, though we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130180 - 2017-09-21