Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13951 - 13960 of 30142 for consulta de causas.

Marvin G. Bartholf v. Rita J. Bartholf
exercised its discretion because it applied an incorrect legal standard, we review that issue of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16269 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Urdahl, 2005 WI App 191, ¶11, 286 Wis. 2d 476, 704 N.W.2d 324 (citation omitted). We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=395050 - 2021-07-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290695 - 2020-09-24

[PDF] NOTICE
a plea withdrawal motion without an evidentiary hearing under the de novo standard, independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48465 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id., ¶33. Whether the elements are met is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107953 - 2014-02-17

Eau Claire County v. Michael J. Asher
the applicability of a zoning ordinance to a given set of facts is a question of law we review de novo. County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10290 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. DISCUSSION ¶7 The parties agree that we review de novo the circuit court’s decision to dismiss based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170438 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
parties have briefed the merits of Taylor’s Fifth Amendment claim and that our standard of review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215510 - 2018-07-18

[PDF] Michael P. Shea v. Village of Brown Deer Police Commission
that it was not empowered to conduct a de novo review, to take testimony, or to make its own credibility determinations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14259 - 2014-09-15

State v. Earl F. Beaver
. VanLaarhoven, 2001 WI App 275 at ¶5. Despite our de novo standard of review, we nonetheless value the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4143 - 2005-03-31